Submitted by judda on 5 October, 2005 - 09:57 #211
i swear down!
ask them!
—
What you put in the hearts of others; is what goes back into your own heart…
Submitted by Medarris on 5 October, 2005 - 14:43 #212
"Constantine" wrote:
From you I learn that Islam asks for a bloodbath in Kashmir, a naziesque exportation of all jews in Israel, and the beating of any muslim who finds himself unconvinced of your Prophet's merit.
Actually, dave, I mentioned previously that the hindu soldeirs are open targets. Sorry but thats the way it is, similarly for the indian army, the kashmir freedom fighters are open targets. I dont think I am crazy or bloodthirsty is agreeing that teh fighters on both sides are legitimate targets.
Deprting jews back to europe isnt such a crazy idea. If they could come 'back' to 'israel' after millenia I dont see why they cant go back to their real homes.
Beating people is fun! Joke. But seriously , the guy grew up with the truth in his face and stil he renegades, what is with that.
Again bloodbath? No. Bloodbath would be to kill indiscriminately. Killing indian occupation soldiers is not a bloodbath, the whole point of a soldier is that he fights and puts his life into the equation. The whole point of a mujahid is thesame, he is offering potentially his life. So dont chat rubbish yeh.
—
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
Submitted by St George on 7 October, 2005 - 20:48 #213
"Med" wrote:
Actually, dave, I mentioned previously that the hindu soldeirs are open targets. Sorry but thats the way it is, similarly for the indian army, the kashmir freedom fighters are open targets. I dont think I am crazy or bloodthirsty is agreeing that teh fighters on both sides are legitimate targets.
Deprting jews back to europe isnt such a crazy idea. If they could come 'back' to 'israel' after millenia I dont see why they cant go back to their real homes.
Beating people is fun! Joke. But seriously , the guy grew up with the truth in his face and stil he renegades, what is with that.
Again bloodbath? No. Bloodbath would be to kill indiscriminately. Killing indian occupation soldiers is not a bloodbath, the whole point of a soldier is that he fights and puts his life into the equation. The whole point of a mujahid is thesame, he is offering potentially his life. So dont chat rubbish yeh.
who is dis med dimwit?
900 posts!? i never noticed dis stupid nazi before…
he wants to savagely beat arabs who don’t wanna be muslims…wot an donkey
dis clown wants to start yet another war between india and the pakistani backed “freedom fighters”…last time they went to war india won…now both sides got nukes…but dimwits still wanna fight…
“deport” jews back too anti semetic europe…id say da jews have 5million reasons for not wanting to return to europe…every time the arabs tried to annihilate them since then, the israelis soundly defeated them...but bloodthirsty buffoons still wanna fight…
a natural bnp supporter as ever i did see...
funny how da likes of med r happy to urge holy war from 1000s of miles away, and send someone else son of to die for his cause, while he wont get off his own sorry arse…
muppet…
:roll:
—
POWER TO THE PEOPLE
Submitted by Medarris on 7 October, 2005 - 23:00 #214
When the people of knowledge come across a person of ignorance they say a word of peace.
Anti semetic europe eh? Well shudnt europt sort its anti semetism out. And just cos europe is anti semite doesnt give the jews a right to steal he land of the believers. Abt not doing anything myself, this is about expresing ideas no1 is telling any1 to go to palestine or india.
Now abt india pakistan. Get your facts right about whats going on b4 u open ur mouth. You think jews beat arabs and india beat pakistan? OK so they did. But my ideas arent based on who wins, my ideas are about the akhirah, a concept lost on non-believers. For me even if the whole world was on falsehood, I hope in ALLAH that he should keep me on truth. So what if someone so any arabs died fighting israel, that is their forune for they have attaind everlasting life. SubhanALLAH, THE Sahabah spoke truly when they confrontted the persians and said we love the death in the battlefield more than you peole lve wine.
and about arabs wanting to annihalate the jews? Where did you get such a stupid idea? You making out like the jews were the defenders and the arabs were the attackers, lol. You seem to ignore the fact that the jews were the colonisers/settlers, they were the ones who came on another peoples land and mde their own state. So who are the defenders and who are the aggressors?
For your info, the jews suffered for centuries at the hands of your christian brethren because they were perceived s christ-killers. The recent fanaticism of the arabs towads the jews is the result of israel, before then it was your brothers in faith who did the killings upon the jews, soi why shud the arabs pay for your peoples injustice?
If europe feels so bad, cut of a bit of europe and give it to the jews, don go nicking others lands and dumping the jews there.
When the people of knowledge come across a person of ignorance they say a word of peace.
.
OH! so THAT explains ur
"k, salaam" answers to us
we're the people of ignorance and ur the people of knowledge
very intresting
btw did u know that shaytaan wasa person of knowldge too
too bad his arrogant attitude led to him being eternally damned
Submitted by Sirus on 8 October, 2005 - 06:12 #216
do not insult Med....he is the chosen one
sent to these forums to rid us all of evil and cure our diseases :roll:
—
The Lover is ever drunk with love;
He is free, he is mad,
He dances with ecstasy and delight.
Caught by our own thoughts,
We worry about every little thing,
But once we get drunk on that love,
Whatever will be, will be.
ɐɥɐɥ
Submitted by Medarris on 8 October, 2005 - 12:18 #217
SUBHANALLAH I try to follow the people of knowledge by not engaging in debate and arguement and I am condemned.
If I asnwer your ideas I am accused of being narrowminded, if I refuse to get into it and just try and follow what the people of knowledge do then I am accused of being arrogant?
SubhanALLAH!
Cant win with some ppl.
SO do I argue with you or not? Which is the best way?
As for arrogance I do have a lot, make dua that ALLAH rids me of this disease.
If it is a futile arguement, its better to avoid it.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
SO do I argue with you or not? Which is the best way?
.
It’s up to you what you wish to do. This is a discussion forum after all.
However, you shouldn’t be surprised if people feel insulted when you refer to them as being the “people of ignorance” and yourself as being “the people of knowledge”.
Submitted by Medarris on 8 October, 2005 - 16:12 #220
some ppl are determined to misunderstand me, i cant do anything about those with dense minds. I was saying that its a fact people of knowledge say words of peace when coming across peolpe of ignorance so i tried to EMULATE people of knowledge by saying words of peace, nothing to do with any1 being a person of ignoracne, but what am I wasting my time explaining to someone who ALWAYS misunderstands and gives wrong meaning to what i write.
some ppl are determined to misunderstand me, i cant do anything about those with dense minds. I was saying that its a fact people of knowledge say words of peace when coming across peolpe of ignorance so i tried to EMULATE people of knowledge by saying words of peace, nothing to do with any1 being a person of ignoracne, but what am I wasting my time explaining to someone who ALWAYS misunderstands and gives wrong meaning to what i write.
To ALLAH do we belong, and to HIM is our return.
you see if you posted the above post, but never wrote:
Quote:
but what am I wasting my time explaining to someone who ALWAYS misunderstands and gives wrong meaning to what i write.
There would be no problem. Your posts always hint at a hidden insult. Others reply without the covertness.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Medarris on 8 October, 2005 - 20:06 #222
Yes I also encode insults into my writing. Oops done it again.
You know what it is. I say it openly, people of your group are programmed to think negatively about the people of my group, its a fact. So whatever I write your people look for hidden meanings and hidden curses when there is nothing like that intended. About what i wrote at the end, it means I qsn myself abt why I waste time explaining to ppl who are not intereseted in what I write, they simply wish to have an argument.
SubhanALLAH I dont find pleasure in debating with the members here, so I have stopped alhamdulillah. Oh now I have put in another hidden curse!
'people of your group think negativey of people of my group'
I do not think in terms of groups. Others may, but I speak for myself only. You have just shown there you do. I try to be objective, and will agree with I think is right, not what a particular group or person says.
you see if I ended this post by saying 'God why do i have to exlain myself over and over to these people who are not willing to learn' That will be an insult desguised as a prayer.
saying 'Ya allah is aadmi ko raahat dila' means the person is misquided, but hidden a prayer.Language also plays alot into it.
When taken to account, you always deny your 'almost' insults. But you continue to use them.
I find underhand remarks in alot of posts both by yourself, and others. I generally ignore them, as thye may be unintentional. However I normall se such thing in almost every post by yourself. Soe times its a joke, at other times it may even be subconscious. But it is definitely there.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Beast on 20 November, 2005 - 13:30 #224
When it's completed in 2007 it will be twice the size of Canary Wharf (Britain's tallest building). It will dominate the Mecca skyline, and overshadow the Great Mosque.
.. and it's being built by Osama's family.
Submitted by Dave on 20 November, 2005 - 15:32 #225
"irfghan" wrote:
.. and it's being built by Osama's family.
Ya know...
Sometimes...
Those saudis man...
I seriously think the world would be a far better place if the entire saudi family just disappeared one day.
and we could so do that
I know a Saudi Prince actually - he lives in Hilton Head. Not that that's all that spectacular seeing as there are approximately 10 bajillion Saudi Princes.
Total weirdo, he bought all these hideous statutes, painted them green, and put them in his front lawn.
lol you can imagine how that went with all the retirees.
Submitted by Medarris on 20 November, 2005 - 18:42 #226
When it's completed in 2007 it will be twice the size of Canary Wharf (Britain's tallest building). It will dominate the Mecca skyline, and overshadow the Great Mosque.
.. and it's being built by Osama's family.
Is this the one that is being built opposite Bab Malik Abd al Azeez?
MashaALLAH.
—
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
Submitted by You on 20 November, 2005 - 18:44 #227
Dunno... but apparently skyscrapers are a sign of Qiyamah...
(heard that yesterday... was lisening about the founding of Kufa by hadhrat Salman farsi (ra)... and one of the rules layed down by Hadhrat Umar (ra) was the limiting of multi storey buildings.)
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Beast on 20 November, 2005 - 18:44 #228
Yes it is.
Don't know what the 'MashaALLAH' is about.
Submitted by Medarris on 20 November, 2005 - 18:47 #229
mashaALLAH - what ALLAH liked
—
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
Submitted by Beast on 20 November, 2005 - 18:49 #230
:roll:
Submitted by Dave on 20 November, 2005 - 18:50 #231
lol this situation seems more like MashaSaudi
Most muslims i've talked to think the Saudis are on a campaign to destroy anything having to do with Muhammad in Mecca to "purify" the city of idols - and builing large hotel complexes for pilgrim money.
Submitted by Beast on 20 November, 2005 - 18:52 #232
"Constantine" wrote:
lol this situation seems more like MashaSaudi
Most muslims i've talked to think the Saudis are on a campaign to destroy anything having to do with Muhammad in Mecca to "purify" the city of idols - and builing large hotel complexes for pilgrim money.
Couldn't be more right.
But the Saudis cound be overthrown this time next year.
Submitted by Dave on 20 November, 2005 - 18:55 #233
"irfghan" wrote:
But the Saudis cound be overthrown this time next year.
That would be lovely i'm sick of them - their oil - [i]their[/i] religion - their american friends - their misogyny - brutality - money
All of it.
Why aren't cities like Mecca and Medinah ruled by a religious commission instead of a country?
Like Jerusalem to the Christians, they should rightly belong to God in islamic hearts, and shouldn't be exploited for pilgrim money.
The proceeds from pilgrim money could be used to help poor muslims do a hajj or better yet eat dinner.
Submitted by You on 20 November, 2005 - 18:57 #234
But would the international community accept such a thing? (the overthrow of Saudi?)
and why do you think they could be overthrown now?
the accetion of power has happened pretty smoothly...
or is that just a general statement that anything can happen?
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Beast on 20 November, 2005 - 18:57 #235
"Constantine" wrote:
Why aren't cities like Mecca and Medinah ruled by a religious commission instead of a country?
Ha, and let the Ahlul Bidah have a say in how the Holy Cities are run? No way.
Submitted by You on 20 November, 2005 - 19:00 #236
Its the only thing that gives the Saudi's any semblance of authority.
'Protectors of the ofthe haramain.'
They forget that they murderred 10,000 people on the day of hajj to gain power.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Dawud on 20 November, 2005 - 19:01 #237
"Med" wrote:
Anti semetic europe eh? Well shudnt europt sort its anti semetism out. And just cos europe is anti semite doesnt give the jews a right to steal he land of the believers.
anti semetic europe? STILL?? I thought that was sorted out now.
"Med" wrote:
and about arabs wanting to annihalate the jews? You making out like the jews were the defenders and the arabs were the attackers, lol. You seem to ignore the fact that the jews were the colonisers/settlers, they were the ones who came on another peoples land and mde their own state. So who are the defenders and who are the aggressors?
For your info, the jews suffered for centuries at the hands of your christian brethren because they were perceived s christ-killers. The recent fanaticism of the arabs towads the jews is the result of israel, before then it was your brothers in faith who did the killings upon the jews, soi why shud the arabs pay for your peoples injustice?
The man has a good a good point except that I would distinguish between Jews and Zionists and say that the original Palistinian Jews weren't too keen either when they noticed Zionists buying up Palestinian land in the 1800's. But lets forget the Ottomans are also share a portion of the blame for creating legislation that blatantly stole land off the Palestinian Peasants who had rights over it (so that the Zionist could buy it).
Gentleness and kindness were never a part of anything except that it made it beautiful, and harshness was never a part of anything except that it made it ugly.
Through cheating, stealing, and lying, one may get required results but finally one becomes
Submitted by Dave on 20 November, 2005 - 19:04 #238
"Admin" wrote:
But would the international community accept such a thing? (the overthrow of Saudi?)
and why do you think they could be overthrown now?
the accetion of power has happened pretty smoothly...
or is that just a general statement that anything can happen?
Hell no
civil disorder in the saudi oil fields?!
Submitted by You on 20 November, 2005 - 19:06 #239
what would the price hit?
$100 a barrell?
$200?
more?
I can see why the intl community would rather have the current regime.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Beast on 20 November, 2005 - 19:08 #240
"Admin" wrote:
I can see why the intl community would rather have the current regime.
i swear down!
ask them!
What you put in the hearts of others; is what goes back into your own heart…
Actually, dave, I mentioned previously that the hindu soldeirs are open targets. Sorry but thats the way it is, similarly for the indian army, the kashmir freedom fighters are open targets. I dont think I am crazy or bloodthirsty is agreeing that teh fighters on both sides are legitimate targets.
Deprting jews back to europe isnt such a crazy idea. If they could come 'back' to 'israel' after millenia I dont see why they cant go back to their real homes.
Beating people is fun! Joke. But seriously , the guy grew up with the truth in his face and stil he renegades, what is with that.
Again bloodbath? No. Bloodbath would be to kill indiscriminately. Killing indian occupation soldiers is not a bloodbath, the whole point of a soldier is that he fights and puts his life into the equation. The whole point of a mujahid is thesame, he is offering potentially his life. So dont chat rubbish yeh.
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
who is dis med dimwit?
900 posts!? i never noticed dis stupid nazi before…
he wants to savagely beat arabs who don’t wanna be muslims…wot an donkey
dis clown wants to start yet another war between india and the pakistani backed “freedom fighters”…last time they went to war india won…now both sides got nukes…but dimwits still wanna fight…
“deport” jews back too anti semetic europe…id say da jews have 5million reasons for not wanting to return to europe…every time the arabs tried to annihilate them since then, the israelis soundly defeated them...but bloodthirsty buffoons still wanna fight…
a natural bnp supporter as ever i did see...
funny how da likes of med r happy to urge holy war from 1000s of miles away, and send someone else son of to die for his cause, while he wont get off his own sorry arse…
muppet…
:roll:
POWER TO THE PEOPLE
When the people of knowledge come across a person of ignorance they say a word of peace.
Anti semetic europe eh? Well shudnt europt sort its anti semetism out. And just cos europe is anti semite doesnt give the jews a right to steal he land of the believers. Abt not doing anything myself, this is about expresing ideas no1 is telling any1 to go to palestine or india.
Now abt india pakistan. Get your facts right about whats going on b4 u open ur mouth. You think jews beat arabs and india beat pakistan? OK so they did. But my ideas arent based on who wins, my ideas are about the akhirah, a concept lost on non-believers. For me even if the whole world was on falsehood, I hope in ALLAH that he should keep me on truth. So what if someone so any arabs died fighting israel, that is their forune for they have attaind everlasting life. SubhanALLAH, THE Sahabah spoke truly when they confrontted the persians and said we love the death in the battlefield more than you peole lve wine.
and about arabs wanting to annihalate the jews? Where did you get such a stupid idea? You making out like the jews were the defenders and the arabs were the attackers, lol. You seem to ignore the fact that the jews were the colonisers/settlers, they were the ones who came on another peoples land and mde their own state. So who are the defenders and who are the aggressors?
For your info, the jews suffered for centuries at the hands of your christian brethren because they were perceived s christ-killers. The recent fanaticism of the arabs towads the jews is the result of israel, before then it was your brothers in faith who did the killings upon the jews, soi why shud the arabs pay for your peoples injustice?
If europe feels so bad, cut of a bit of europe and give it to the jews, don go nicking others lands and dumping the jews there.
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
OH! so THAT explains ur
"k, salaam" answers to us
we're the people of ignorance and ur the people of knowledge
very intresting
btw did u know that shaytaan wasa person of knowldge too
too bad his arrogant attitude led to him being eternally damned
do not insult Med....he is the chosen one
sent to these forums to rid us all of evil and cure our diseases :roll:
The Lover is ever drunk with love;
He is free, he is mad,
He dances with ecstasy and delight.
Caught by our own thoughts,
We worry about every little thing,
But once we get drunk on that love,
Whatever will be, will be.
ɐɥɐɥ
SUBHANALLAH I try to follow the people of knowledge by not engaging in debate and arguement and I am condemned.
If I asnwer your ideas I am accused of being narrowminded, if I refuse to get into it and just try and follow what the people of knowledge do then I am accused of being arrogant?
SubhanALLAH!
Cant win with some ppl.
SO do I argue with you or not? Which is the best way?
As for arrogance I do have a lot, make dua that ALLAH rids me of this disease.
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
If it is a futile arguement, its better to avoid it.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
It’s up to you what you wish to do. This is a discussion forum after all.
However, you shouldn’t be surprised if people feel insulted when you refer to them as being the “people of ignorance” and yourself as being “the people of knowledge”.
some ppl are determined to misunderstand me, i cant do anything about those with dense minds. I was saying that its a fact people of knowledge say words of peace when coming across peolpe of ignorance so i tried to EMULATE people of knowledge by saying words of peace, nothing to do with any1 being a person of ignoracne, but what am I wasting my time explaining to someone who ALWAYS misunderstands and gives wrong meaning to what i write.
To ALLAH do we belong, and to HIM is our return.
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
you see if you posted the above post, but never wrote:
There would be no problem. Your posts always hint at a hidden insult. Others reply without the covertness.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Yes I also encode insults into my writing. Oops done it again.
You know what it is. I say it openly, people of your group are programmed to think negatively about the people of my group, its a fact. So whatever I write your people look for hidden meanings and hidden curses when there is nothing like that intended. About what i wrote at the end, it means I qsn myself abt why I waste time explaining to ppl who are not intereseted in what I write, they simply wish to have an argument.
SubhanALLAH I dont find pleasure in debating with the members here, so I have stopped alhamdulillah. Oh now I have put in another hidden curse!
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
'people of your group think negativey of people of my group'
I do not think in terms of groups. Others may, but I speak for myself only. You have just shown there you do. I try to be objective, and will agree with I think is right, not what a particular group or person says.
you see if I ended this post by saying 'God why do i have to exlain myself over and over to these people who are not willing to learn' That will be an insult desguised as a prayer.
saying 'Ya allah is aadmi ko raahat dila' means the person is misquided, but hidden a prayer.Language also plays alot into it.
When taken to account, you always deny your 'almost' insults. But you continue to use them.
I find underhand remarks in alot of posts both by yourself, and others. I generally ignore them, as thye may be unintentional. However I normall se such thing in almost every post by yourself. Soe times its a joke, at other times it may even be subconscious. But it is definitely there.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
[url=http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=34622]This is just one[/url] of the new complexes being built in Mecca. Talk about extravagant.
When it's completed in 2007 it will be twice the size of Canary Wharf (Britain's tallest building). It will dominate the Mecca skyline, and overshadow the Great Mosque.
.. and it's being built by Osama's family.
Ya know...
Sometimes...
Those saudis man...
I seriously think the world would be a far better place if the entire saudi family just disappeared one day.
and we could so do that
I know a Saudi Prince actually - he lives in Hilton Head. Not that that's all that spectacular seeing as there are approximately 10 bajillion Saudi Princes.
Total weirdo, he bought all these hideous statutes, painted them green, and put them in his front lawn.
lol you can imagine how that went with all the retirees.
Is this the one that is being built opposite Bab Malik Abd al Azeez?
MashaALLAH.
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
Dunno... but apparently skyscrapers are a sign of Qiyamah...
(heard that yesterday... was lisening about the founding of Kufa by hadhrat Salman farsi (ra)... and one of the rules layed down by Hadhrat Umar (ra) was the limiting of multi storey buildings.)
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Yes it is.
Don't know what the 'MashaALLAH' is about.
mashaALLAH - what ALLAH liked
Ya ALLAH Madad.
Haq Chaar Yaar
:roll:
lol this situation seems more like MashaSaudi
Most muslims i've talked to think the Saudis are on a campaign to destroy anything having to do with Muhammad in Mecca to "purify" the city of idols - and builing large hotel complexes for pilgrim money.
Couldn't be more right.
But the Saudis cound be overthrown this time next year.
That would be lovely i'm sick of them - their oil - [i]their[/i] religion - their american friends - their misogyny - brutality - money
All of it.
Why aren't cities like Mecca and Medinah ruled by a religious commission instead of a country?
Like Jerusalem to the Christians, they should rightly belong to God in islamic hearts, and shouldn't be exploited for pilgrim money.
The proceeds from pilgrim money could be used to help poor muslims do a hajj or better yet eat dinner.
But would the international community accept such a thing? (the overthrow of Saudi?)
and why do you think they could be overthrown now?
the accetion of power has happened pretty smoothly...
or is that just a general statement that anything can happen?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Ha, and let the Ahlul Bidah have a say in how the Holy Cities are run? No way.
Its the only thing that gives the Saudi's any semblance of authority.
'Protectors of the ofthe haramain.'
They forget that they murderred 10,000 people on the day of hajj to gain power.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
anti semetic europe? STILL?? I thought that was sorted out now.
The man has a good a good point except that I would distinguish between Jews and Zionists and say that the original Palistinian Jews weren't too keen either when they noticed Zionists buying up Palestinian land in the 1800's. But lets forget the Ottomans are also share a portion of the blame for creating legislation that blatantly stole land off the Palestinian Peasants who had rights over it (so that the Zionist could buy it).
BTW all my info is from www.jewsagainsttheoccupation.org
Gentleness and kindness were never a part of anything except that it made it beautiful, and harshness was never a part of anything except that it made it ugly.
Through cheating, stealing, and lying, one may get required results but finally one becomes
Hell no
civil disorder in the saudi oil fields?!
what would the price hit?
$100 a barrell?
$200?
more?
I can see why the intl community would rather have the current regime.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Bastards!
Pages