Submitted by Seraphim on 9 February, 2009 - 23:08 #1
—
Back in BLACK
Submitted by al Afghanee on 11 February, 2009 - 05:12 #2
Ajeeb title- Ustaadh Murtaza Khan is amongst the teachers of the Tayyibun Institute masha'allaah: www.tayyibun.com
Submitted by The Lamp on 11 February, 2009 - 10:37 #3
Looks like an event for..... kids. The way it's laid out and the colour scheme. LOL!
—
“Before death takes away what you are given, give away whatever there is to give.”
Mawlana Jalal ud Din Rumi
Submitted by Naz :D (not verified) on 11 February, 2009 - 22:19 #4
@the Seraph whats so funny?
@Lampy il let you know if it is.
Ive never actually been to one of these before. Apparently they hold one every year near Valentines. Has anyone been to anything like this (not that your gonna admit it)?
Submitted by Naz :D (not verified) on 11 February, 2009 - 22:29 #5
wednesday wrote:
We had one today, it was called "Girls and Boys... and islamic perspective to romance"... I went to one last year, and I knew what they were gna talk about in this talk so didn't really bother with it. It's always before Valentine's Day.
Would you say in your opinion that it raised some interesting points? Did you find it beneficial? Did you learn anything? Would you recommend it to someone who has never been? Sorry a lot of questions.
I learnt that we aren't allowed to mingle for some reasons that didn't make sense then but I do see why now...
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
IS the problem with the mingling or with not having an easy halaal option afterwards?
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
I was trying to link to the (free)mixing topic where I quoted Shaykh Al Qaradawi (but not linked to the article, or that it was a quote of him) to get some comments, discussion.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
erm well the dude IMO came across as a bit of a extremist. If hes a wahhabi that would explain a lot. Some of the stuff he said was not true or i found a bit dodgy.
For example he stated that there was no such thing as divorce in the Prophets family which isnt true. Zainab Bint Jahsh (may Allah(swt) be pleased with her) was first married to the Prophets foster son. The marriage didnt work out so they divorced and then the Prophet married her.
Another example, he said that in the Quran it states if a single person commits adultery then its 100 lashes and if married then they have to be stoned to death. Ive read that in the Quran but its not in the main text rather its in the footnotes which tend to be hadiths or the writers opinion.
Final example which i must admit i have no knowledge of and need to go away and research it but found it proper dodgy. He was saying if a guy is considering a woman for marriage then in the presence of a wali he can see her hair, arms and wait for it.....legs! :? If someone knows/has read anything about this please feel free to share.
Overall a complete waste of time. Didnt learn anything new nor was the talk aimed at ppl like me.
—
No not the gum drop buttons! – Gingy
Submitted by Noor on 17 February, 2009 - 00:13 #10
murtaza khan said that? he is a bit full on.
Submitted by Noor on 17 February, 2009 - 00:04 #11
Naz wrote:
He was saying if a guy is considering a woman for marriage then in the presence of a wali he can see her hair, arms and wait for it.....legs! :? If someone knows/has read anything about this please feel free to share.
did he mention an incident about a sahabi, he saw a woman without hijab but she didn't no he saw him or something like that.
HTs also hold that view, its in one of their books, well a book written by their founder. there are some scholars that hold that view, very very few though. mainstream is no, you cannot see a womans hair or any other part of her body.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Noor on 17 February, 2009 - 00:19 #13
i take that back. it was in some book of their founder but i don't think hts hold that view.
back onto topic - I remember hearing that hadith - I think the Prophet had encouraged the sahabi to see her before marriage?
I had always assumed that even with that, it was under "normal" conditions and not questioned it. Got a link/explanation for the hadith?
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Noor on 17 February, 2009 - 00:26 #15
in the presence of her wali. her face and stuff to see if any attraction is there.
Submitted by MuslimBro on 17 February, 2009 - 01:01 #16
Naz wrote:
erm well the dude IMO came across as a bit of a extremist. If hes a wahhabi that would explain a lot. Some of the stuff he said was not true or i found a bit dodgy.
Try and not stick a label to someone without knowing them properly.
Naz wrote:
Another example, he said that in the Quran it states if a single person commits adultery then its 100 lashes and if married then they have to be stoned to death. Ive read that in the Quran but its not in the main text rather its in the footnotes which tend to be hadiths or the writers opinion.
His ruling was correct though.
Naz wrote:
Final example which i must admit i have no knowledge of and need to go away and research it but found it proper dodgy. He was saying if a guy is considering a woman for marriage then in the presence of a wali he can see her hair, arms and wait for it.....legs! :? If someone knows/has read anything about this please feel free to share.
The ijma is that a man cannot do what you have said. But there is an opinion which is not taken that states that a man is allowed to do the above. Did he mention the scholar's name of whom he took the opinion from?
Is it wrong to find the least strict interpretation of all rulings and follow them?
We could call it the least strict Madhab? LSM for short.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Noor on 17 February, 2009 - 01:17 #18
nafs
Submitted by Angelic (not verified) on 17 February, 2009 - 10:59 #19
That is very perverted, so potentially if a women has many many proposals and all these men hold the view that they can see her arms and legs then all these men wil have viewed her body, thats disgusting.
Submitted by Ya'qub on 17 February, 2009 - 13:08 #20
You wrote:
Is it wrong to find the least strict interpretation of all rulings and follow them?
We could call it the least strict Madhab? LSM for short.
It's not wrong at all for a layman to do that.
But if someone is a student of knowledge, they have to stick to one madhab, because that is the way to approach scripture.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Submitted by Ya'qub on 17 February, 2009 - 13:13 #22
You wrote:
Wahay!
n.b. the rulings you choose to follow still have to be correct... you can't pick and choose the opinions of idiots.
Stick to the four madhabs to be safe.
—
Don't just do something! Stand there.
Submitted by Seraphim on 17 February, 2009 - 13:14 #23
Naz wrote:
He was saying if a guy is considering a woman for marriage then in the presence of a wali he can see her hair, arms and wait for it.....legs! :? If someone knows/has read anything about this please feel free to share.
That's like saying that you have to actually believe the food in a shop is halaal instead of just taking the shopkeeper's word for it.
No fair!
("This 'vodka', is halaal yes?")
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Final example which i must admit i have no knowledge of and need to go away and research it but found it proper dodgy. He was saying if a guy is considering a woman for marriage then in the presence of a wali he can see her hair, arms and wait for it.....legs! :?
that is wrong A girl would probably go through several potential marriage partners so than however many people she probably wont marry will see her body and its pervy
Back in BLACK
Ajeeb title- Ustaadh Murtaza Khan is amongst the teachers of the Tayyibun Institute masha'allaah: www.tayyibun.com
Looks like an event for..... kids. The way it's laid out and the colour scheme. LOL!
“Before death takes away what you are given, give away whatever there is to give.”
Mawlana Jalal ud Din Rumi
@the Seraph whats so funny?
@Lampy il let you know if it is.
Ive never actually been to one of these before. Apparently they hold one every year near Valentines. Has anyone been to anything like this (not that your gonna admit it)?
Would you say in your opinion that it raised some interesting points? Did you find it beneficial? Did you learn anything? Would you recommend it to someone who has never been? Sorry a lot of questions.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
IS the problem with the mingling or with not having an easy halaal option afterwards?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
I was trying to link to the (free)mixing topic where I quoted Shaykh Al Qaradawi (but not linked to the article, or that it was a quote of him) to get some comments, discussion.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
erm well the dude IMO came across as a bit of a extremist. If hes a wahhabi that would explain a lot. Some of the stuff he said was not true or i found a bit dodgy.
For example he stated that there was no such thing as divorce in the Prophets family which isnt true. Zainab Bint Jahsh (may Allah(swt) be pleased with her) was first married to the Prophets foster son. The marriage didnt work out so they divorced and then the Prophet married her.
Another example, he said that in the Quran it states if a single person commits adultery then its 100 lashes and if married then they have to be stoned to death. Ive read that in the Quran but its not in the main text rather its in the footnotes which tend to be hadiths or the writers opinion.
Final example which i must admit i have no knowledge of and need to go away and research it but found it proper dodgy. He was saying if a guy is considering a woman for marriage then in the presence of a wali he can see her hair, arms and wait for it.....legs! :? If someone knows/has read anything about this please feel free to share.
Overall a complete waste of time. Didnt learn anything new nor was the talk aimed at ppl like me.
No not the gum drop buttons! – Gingy
murtaza khan said that? he is a bit full on.
did he mention an incident about a sahabi, he saw a woman without hijab but she didn't no he saw him or something like that.
HTs also hold that view, its in one of their books, well a book written by their founder. there are some scholars that hold that view, very very few though. mainstream is no, you cannot see a womans hair or any other part of her body.
hrm... the HT have some redeeming qualities then?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
i take that back. it was in some book of their founder but i don't think hts hold that view.
ok, they are a useless bunch of... forgeddit it.
They be ok I guess.
EDIT
back onto topic - I remember hearing that hadith - I think the Prophet had encouraged the sahabi to see her before marriage?
I had always assumed that even with that, it was under "normal" conditions and not questioned it. Got a link/explanation for the hadith?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
in the presence of her wali. her face and stuff to see if any attraction is there.
Try and not stick a label to someone without knowing them properly.
His ruling was correct though.
The ijma is that a man cannot do what you have said. But there is an opinion which is not taken that states that a man is allowed to do the above. Did he mention the scholar's name of whom he took the opinion from?
Btw was the talk recorded?
Is it wrong to find the least strict interpretation of all rulings and follow them?
We could call it the least strict Madhab? LSM for short.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
nafs
That is very perverted, so potentially if a women has many many proposals and all these men hold the view that they can see her arms and legs then all these men wil have viewed her body, thats disgusting.
It's not wrong at all for a layman to do that.
But if someone is a student of knowledge, they have to stick to one madhab, because that is the way to approach scripture.
But you and I can pick and choose!
Don't just do something! Stand there.
Wahay!
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
n.b. the rulings you choose to follow still have to be correct... you can't pick and choose the opinions of idiots.
Stick to the four madhabs to be safe.
Don't just do something! Stand there.
perv
Back in BLACK
That's like saying that you have to actually believe the food in a shop is halaal instead of just taking the shopkeeper's word for it.
No fair!
("This 'vodka', is halaal yes?")
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
that is wrong
A girl would probably go through several potential marriage partners so than however many people she probably wont marry will see her body and its pervy
SMILE! its charity