... and more importantly why should you care?
I find the whole concept ridiculous.
The news is that hospitals may try to reduce their carbon footprint by taking meat off the menu. While I do not disagree with that happening itself, the reasoning I find imbecilic.
Can I also add that I suspect that some of the nonsense about global warming will potentially be put to rest this year...
Things need to be sustainable, but measuring carbon footprint etc is useless IMO.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
It's not just that.
Does a bulb made on the other side of the world using exotic chemicals producing exotic waste and then shipped all the way around the world to your house produce less waste overall than a locally manufactured traditional light bulb - even if the former uses less energy when in use?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
energy efficiency is good. A noble goal IMO.
But the energy efficient bulbs are more expensive and cause a different type of toxic waste.
That toxic waste probably has a lower carbon footprint, but does it mean that it is better?
Nuclear waste has a very small carbon footprint... maybe even negative because it stops the use of coal/gas/oil!
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Why is that?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
lol, doesnt perfume attract shaitan?
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
lol!
o ye btw jus cuz i dnt wear perfume doesnt mean i smell! just thought id make that clear
cleanliness is half ur deen!
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Where did you get that from?
Sounds like one of those "alcohol is the urine of a camel" type statements...
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
lol, erm i cnt remember tbh :S either read it somewhere or someone told me?
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
but the reason for it was probably not to attract the amorous attentions of the opposite gender - so a way to protect the chastity.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Firstly sorry bout going off topic You, but seeing as its come up...
it also attracts attention from men? i think iv heard/read that too
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
But hunting for a wife is allowed and a noble deed!
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
You would have to ask the scholars who put the prohibition down/passed it on in the first place.
I would guess that the amount of it would matter?
and these days not wearing any may cause more attention than actually wearing some.
Weird stuff (and I do find it hard to always agree with scholars. A personal flaw in me that is of a massive scale.)
As for perfume - not a big fan of it. antiperspirant is where its at.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
as long as u use something
lol
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Why do you think that is? Is it because they (tend to be) old and 'they don't understand me! NOBODY understands me!' or is it something else?
I will ignore the fact that you should put the full stop after the end of the brakets.
Don't just do something! Stand there.
I sometimes see "flaws" in some logic used. Of course that could just mean that I am wrong, but that can be hard to accept.
I also think that there is a lack of critical thought around.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Certainly there are loads of scholars/non-scholars who don't use logic. And if you try to put logic into the argument they say things like "who knows best? You or Allah (swt)?"
But thankfuly, in Syria I have learned that logic IS a fundamental principal to use in rulings.
And I have discovered the way that this gives us flexibility and support.
Don't just do something! Stand there.
but am I not just a pleb without knowledge playing with an uzi?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
No. You're playing with a diamond.
Don't just do something! Stand there.
Is that good or bad?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.