Jewish people were most likely to be self-employed in Great Britain in 2004, followed by Muslims and Buddhists. A third of Jewish people and around a fifth of Muslims and Buddhists were self-employed. These compared with around one in ten Christians, Sikhs, Hindus and those with no religion.
Certain religious groups are concentrated in particular industries. In 2004, 37 per cent of Muslim men in employment were working in the distribution, hotel and restaurant industry compared with 17 per cent of Christian men and no more than 27 per cent of men in any other group.
Muslim and Sikh men were more likely than other men to be working in the transport and communication industry. More than one in seven from these religions worked in this sector compared with less than one in ten from any other religious group.
Jewish men were more likely than men from any other religion to work in the banking, finance and insurance industry. Around a third of Jewish men worked in this sector.
Among women in employment, Sikh, Muslim and Hindu women were most likely to work in the distribution, hotel and restaurant industry. Over a quarter of each group worked in this industry compared with around a fifth of women from most other groups. Sikh women were more likely than other women to work in manufacturing - one in seven worked in manufacturing compared with less than one in ten women from any other
Among men in employment, Jews and Hindus are the most likely to work in managerial or professional occupations – about half in each group in 2004. One in 20 Hindu men was a medical practitioner in 2004 compared with one in 200 Christian men.
Muslim and Sikh men are the least likely to be working in managerial or professional occupations (less than a third of these groups), and the most likely to be working in low skilled jobs. In 2004, almost one in ten Muslim men was a taxi driver, cab driver or chauffeur. This was much higher than the proportion in any other group.
The proportion of Christian men working in managerial or professional occupations is similar to that for Muslims and Sikhs, at around 30 per cent. However, Christian men are more likely than Muslims and Sikhs to be working in skilled trade jobs. Christian men are also less likely than Muslims to be in low skilled jobs.
Patterns are similar for women, although not as pronounced. Jewish and Buddhist women are the most likely to work in managerial or professional occupations. Sikh women are the most likely to be working in low skilled jobs. Around one in ten Sikh women was working as a process, plant and machine operative in 2004 compared with around 3 per cent in most other groups.
Muslim, Hindu and Sikh women are concentrated in sales and customer service jobs (between 16 and 20 per cent), compared with 12 per cent among Christians and those with no religion.
Basically this is a whole load of stats that I thought was interesting.
What do the rest of you think?
I don't see what this has to do with religion. It's more to do with when particular ethnic groups (and thus religious groups) migrated to Britain, and for which reason they migrated, i.e. from which social class they were from.
In my opinion, the 'religious' aspect given to it, is misleading and unhelpful.
For instance, did you know that in America the most economically successful 'religious group' is Hindu, followed by Muslim.
Don't just do something! Stand there.
I think it also matters how long a community has been established.
Since a lot of Muslims in the UK are from the indian sub-continent, and most of them had to sort of start anew when moving over.
There was less opportunity to "pass on" the trades of the parent as the society worked in a different way. Most of the migrants went into mills etc since the chances of them having much education was pretty low.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Which is why I said this:
Don't just do something! Stand there.