Issue 10 - OUT NOW!!!

i didn't know it was a bad word, consider it edited.

(now you need to edit ur post cos ur the big swearing-sarah now

I used it once or twice na a friend told me what i meant or supposedly meant so i dont use it anymore.

p.s i edited my post

What did he say? Was it the T word?

No it wasnt

It was the (other) 'N' word

Yes but dont worry about it and just dont vote yaqub while your at it vote me!!

Ya'qubIt was the (other) 'N' word

Surely not the one used in SouthPark? :shock:

(I can't think of the "other" one atm.)

admin, what is it with you and southpark?

Nothing. The other reference you are talking about I did not know was from Southpark til I searched for it yesterday.

This one is from the first 5 or so minutes of 1101 - With Apologies to Jesse Jackson. (I will delete this link soon.)

Either that or I am really a big kid.

You

Ya'qubIt was the (other) 'N' word

Surely not the one used in SouthPark? :shock:

(I can't think of the "other" one atm.)

How on earth are the socialist worker party that?

plus, I said the 'other' N word.

I will PM you.

Humour
---------
Yaqub (or rather, his head).
(the rest)
(of him)

*his own butt* *his own butt*
*his own butt* *admin's head* *his own butt*
*his own butt* *his own butt*

Shut up fat a**

Seraphim

Naz1) the repetition of the words h*/s***/b****. It was in the previous issue and again in this one. If it continues ppl might think its ok to use such words you need to kinda tone it down.

Really? Where? The articles are usually thoroughly read before we go to print... maybe they were just used for comic effect?

Please point out which article.

Fatal Attraction term H* used in subtitle
Sound of Islam
and i cant remember which issue it was but it was the conversation with Aliyah and Jameela where the word H* was used. Im probs just readin to much into it.

Seraphim

Naz1) How can we find OBL if we dont know what the animated OBL looks like?

The assumption is that by now every1 knows what OBL looks like and the animated version will be obvious when you see it.
Why? couldnt you find him? In the first one it was accused of being too easy so we made it harder... and by we I mean me.

of course i found him. Took me literally 2 seconds. He is under Tasmanian and on Homers left hand side. Its too easy coz everybody is dressed differently. With wheres wally the ppl on the page dress all the same hence why its harder.

Seraphim

Naz2) with Ali being in prison you could have perhaps put him in a black and white horizontal stripe jumpsuit. He could have still kept his bling bling on coz that way you can tell the difference between the two.

Because in prison they dont wear black and white stripe jumpsuits. Only in old cartoons will you actually see that.

True but everyone always associates the black and white with prison.

MuslimsBro

Sirusthey wear orange

Not in the UK they don't.

My thoughts exactly. I think in America its orange.

In prison's over here i think its faded blue i think.

Irfan and or FunzoIn prison's over here i think its faded blue i think.

yep

Irfan and or FunzoIn prison's over here i think its faded blue i think.

I thought that that was nurses?

No i mean grey-ish blue worn out

Ya'qub

Irfan and or FunzoIn prison's over here i think its faded blue i think.

I thought that that was nurses?

They were blue... just ask an ex-con.

Im sure they will tell you.

ok ill ask my cousin.

Ed/Admin/Anyone that can,

If you don't already, you should have a full page advert for the forums somewhere in the magazine!

Joie de VivreEd/Admin/Anyone that can,

If you don't already, you should have a full page advert for the forums somewhere in the magazine!

WE promote the website on front cover and top of every page
but this issue i am thinking of a small advert on the forums- wont be full page- will attract new ppl here. But i think every issue bring snew faces here anyway.

so to all the new comers- do you come on here after seeing the mag or by accidentally visiting the site?

Kismat actually lol.

OmrowSalam

The article "Fatal Attraction" was one of the worst pieces ever in Revival Magazine.

I dont understand why on earth would a pious lady write such rubbish.

Did she not realise that it can harm children.

One of my friend told me his young niece 10 read it and asked him: "do girls and boys these things to boys, and what far?"

We were all shocked at the corruptive influence of the article.

Omrow

i think that article 'fatal attractions' was one of the best articles of the magazine..

ur right, Revival is for teenagers.. those who are atleast over the age of 14.. coz thats whats hppning in the world these days..
i got most of the girls and boys 2 read that article in my year, and they all addmitted to it.. saying that what was written in there was true in most cases.. so i think that theyre was nothing wrong with that article..

yehh.. true say, Revival should not be given to Children... unsutaible 4 them...

Sound of Islam

The X factor

If you need anyone to do press releases I might be able to help.

RajIf you need anyone to do press releases I might be able to help.

the magazine has female writers tho, not sure if your gonna wana

especially when ya find out that one out of two (THATS 50%) of the sub-editors is female

Correction, both sub-editors are female. That's 100%.

NoorCorrection, both sub-editors are female. That's 100%.

:shock: SHOCK HORROR!

(are they? whos the other one? Imaani?)