US Scum-Soldiers Rape Girl , Kill Family

BEIJI, Iraq - Five U.S. Army soldiers are being investigated for allegedly raping a young woman, then killing her and three members of her family in Iraq, a U.S. military official told The Associated Press on Friday.

The soldiers also allegedly burned the body of the woman they are accused of raping.

Maj. Gen. James D. Thurman, commander of coalition troops in Baghdad, had ordered a criminal investigation into the alleged killing of a family of four in Mahmoudiya, south of Baghdad, the U.S. command said. It did not elaborate.

"The entire investigation will encompass everything that could have happened that evening. We're not releasing any specifics of an ongoing investigation," said military spokesman Maj. Todd Breasseale.

"There is no indication what led soldiers to this home. The investigation just cracked open. We're just beginning to dig into the details."

However, a U.S. official close to the investigation said at least one of the soldiers, all assigned to the 502nd Infantry Regiment, has admitted his role and has been arrested. Two soldiers from the same regiment were slain this month when they were kidnapped at a checkpoint near Youssifiyah.

At least four other soldiers have had their weapons taken away and are confined to Forward Operating Base Mahmoudiyah south of Baghdad. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.

The official said the killings appear to be unrelated to the kidnappings but that a soldier felt compelled to report the killings after his fellow soldiers' bodies were found.

The killings appeared to have been a "crime of opportunity," the official said. The soldiers had not been attacked by insurgents but had noticed the woman on previous patrols.

These people were born white trash who got the brilliant idea that the military would make them any better? Every last one of them from the GIs up to their brigade commander should be shot for this, I can't believe the military is even going to bother with a court martial!! They should get a tribunal at best then a short drop and a quick stop. Better yet just give them to the Iraqis, I'm sure they'll figure something appropriate out.

And what the hell is this?!

Quote:
The official said the mutilation of the slain soldiers stirred feelings of guilt and led at least one of them to reveal the rape-slaying on June 22.

According to a senior Army official, the alleged incident was first revealed by a soldier during a routine counseling-type session. The official, who requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing, said that soldier did not witness the incident but heard about it.

A second soldier, who also was not involved, said he overhead soldiers conspiring to commit the crimes, and then later saw bloodstains on their clothes, the official said.

He also said the four people killed included three adults and a child, and one of the adults was the woman who allegedly was raped.

They overhear that a rape/murder is being [i]planned[/i] and said absolutely nothing?!

This is just one of many countless reasons why the 'insurgency' goes on in places like Iraq. The news tells you one story and what actually goes on behind closed doors is a totally different matter and we only get hear about it very rarely.

Its about time the west get out of Muslim lands and stop occupying them because sooner or later theyre gonna pay for it. The sad thing is it's always the innocent that are the victims and the evil war mongering trash always get away with it.

These illegal wars are causing nothing but mischeif,bloodshed and instability within the world. We as civilians need to stand up and do something to stop these occupations.

Islam is the Key to paradise but without practice it won't open the gates.

"Don Karnage" wrote:
These people were born white trash who got the brilliant idea that the military would make them any better? Every last one of them from the GIs up to their brigade commander should be shot for this, I can't believe the military is even going to bother with a court martial!! They should get a tribunal at best then a short drop and a quick stop. Better yet just give them to the Iraqis, I'm sure they'll figure something appropriate out.

And what the hell is this?!

Quote:
The official said the mutilation of the slain soldiers stirred feelings of guilt and led at least one of them to reveal the rape-slaying on June 22.

According to a senior Army official, the alleged incident was first revealed by a soldier during a routine counseling-type session. The official, who requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing, said that soldier did not witness the incident but heard about it.

A second soldier, who also was not involved, said he overhead soldiers conspiring to commit the crimes, and then later saw bloodstains on their clothes, the official said.

He also said the four people killed included three adults and a child, and one of the adults was the woman who allegedly was raped.

They overhear that a rape/murder is being [i]planned[/i] and said absolutely nothing?!

This doesn't suprise me. Americans are the same as any culture when they're on the edge of death.

If Mexican immigrants tried to create a seperate state in California/Texas the National Guard would be just as ruthless as Saddam's Republican Guard vis a vis the Kurds.

Quote:
A former US soldier has been arrested and charged with killing four Iraqi civilians after raping one of them, the US Justice Department said.

Prosecutors say Steven Green, 21, and other troops raped a young woman before killing her and three relatives in Mahmoudiya, south of Baghdad, in March.

A military inquiry into the incident is the latest in a series into alleged abuses by US troops in Iraq.

Mr Green, a former army private, was arrested recently in North Carolina.

He faces a possible death penalty if convicted.

A statement from the US attorney in Kentucky says Mr Green is charged with going to a house near Mahmoudiya with three other people to rape a woman living in the house.

He allegedly shot and killed a man, a woman and a five-year-old girl and after raping another woman, he is alleged to have shot and killed her, the statement said.

According to an affidavit, Mr Green took the family into a bedroom, from where shots were heard.

"Green came to the bedroom door and told everyone, 'I just killed them. All are dead," the statement says.

Another affidavit said Mr Green, who belonged to the 502nd Infantry Regiment, had been discharged from the army "due to a personality disorder" before the rape and killings were known about, the Associated Press news agency reported.

The suspects belong to the same unit as two soldiers kidnapped, tortured and killed by insurgents south of Baghdad last month.

Some reports suggested that this event may have spurred soldiers to come forward with information about the killings.

Mr Green is due to appear in court at a detention hearing in Charlotte, North Carolina, on 10 July.

Stuff like that ticks me off so badly :evil: Evil piece of crap

"Muslim Bro" wrote:
Quote:
A former US soldier has been arrested and charged with killing four Iraqi civilians after raping one of them, the US Justice Department said.

Prosecutors say Steven Green, 21, and other troops raped a young woman before killing her and three relatives in Mahmoudiya, south of Baghdad, in March.

A military inquiry into the incident is the latest in a series into alleged abuses by US troops in Iraq.

Mr Green, a former army private, was arrested recently in North Carolina.

[b]He faces a possible death penalty if convicted.[/b]

A statement from the US attorney in Kentucky says Mr Green is charged with going to a house near Mahmoudiya with three other people to rape a woman living in the house.

He allegedly shot and killed a man, a woman and a five-year-old girl and after raping another woman, he is alleged to have shot and killed her, the statement said.

According to an affidavit, Mr Green took the family into a bedroom, from where shots were heard.

"Green came to the bedroom door and told everyone, 'I just killed them. All are dead," the statement says.

Another affidavit said Mr Green, who belonged to the 502nd Infantry Regiment, had been discharged from the army "due to a personality disorder" before the rape and killings were known about, the Associated Press news agency reported.

The suspects belong to the same unit as two soldiers kidnapped, tortured and killed by insurgents south of Baghdad last month.

Some reports suggested that this event may have spurred soldiers to come forward with information about the killings.

Mr Green is due to appear in court at a detention hearing in Charlotte, North Carolina, on 10 July.

See, it amazes me how people can be anti-death penalty with crimes like this. They clap and chant and hold little prayer vigils about how "inhumane" it is, I think it's because it gives them a false sense of moral superiority to get high on. I can't stand liberals.

Fry the bastard, kentucky style.

Would be great if they re-introduced the death penalty in the UK!

But very unlikely as we're a member of the E.U.

"Don Karnage" wrote:

See, it amazes me how people can be anti-death penalty with crimes like this. They clap and chant and hold little prayer vigils about how "inhumane" it is, I think it's because it gives them a false sense of moral superiority to get high on. I can't stand liberals.

Fry the bastard, kentucky style.

Totally agree with you, dunno how such pieces of filth can remain on this earth..

Why is death penalty seen as imhumane for an inhumane act? Its beyond me!

"Muslim Bro" wrote:
Would be great if they re-introduced the death penalty in the UK!

But very unlikely as we're a member of the E.U.

If the democrats got their way [i]we'd[/i] be members of the EU. The death penalty is an absolute necessity, it's a very powerful tool of the state and every measure should be taken to prevent it's abuse (a 3-6 tiered appeal system I'd say suffices pretty well) but it's a necessity. Some people no longer hold any social value and some crimes are too evil to let pass with anything less.

I'm already furious because that guy couey who raped and killed jessica lunsford

[img]

[url= get off on some technicality[/url], some sharp talking hemp smoking liberal trial attorney is going to see to it he's back on the streets so long as his "rights" aren't in any way inconvenienced.

I've seen some programmes about the death penalty in the US. and apparently it takes more money to execute someone than to keep them in prison. I was shocked when I heard that.

I think alot of the money is spent on the appeal system (judges, lawyers)

Also it's amazing that the US. has about 2 million inmates locked up, the UK is afraid of spending money building more prisons.

"Muslim Bro" wrote:
I've seen some programmes about the death penalty in the US. and apparently it takes more money to execute someone than to keep them in prison. I was shocked when I heard that.

I think alot of the money is spent on the appeal system (judges, lawyers)

Yes, there is a lot of expense to the taxpayer. But it's such a ridiculous argument - you could use it just as easily to say "well it costs more to charge and prosecute offenders than it does to not, so we might as well just scrap laws." It doesn't address the issue, which is what is the appropriate response for crimes of this nature, murder rapings etc. The reason liberals blather on about cost is because they have nothing left to talk about for reciprocity. Their usual arguments for "rehabilitative detention" fall flat on their face because any idiot knows you aren't going to rehabilitate a rapist child molester or a murderer. Retributive justice holds the day.

There should be laws against reckless stupidity.

I honestly don't like alot of things the US. are doing but one thing I rate them for is their justice system.

They punish criminals very harshly.

A programme I watched recently. An inmate got 15 years added on for assaulting a correctional officer. In the UK. it's very rare to get 10 years for hit and run.

Quote:
[b]Troops 'took turns' to rape Iraqi[/b]

A US military hearing has examined testimony of how three soldiers took it in turns to try to rape an Iraqi girl aged 14 in Mahmudiya in March.
The girl and three family members were allegedly killed by four US soldiers.

Graphic details of the attack at the family's home came in a sworn statement by one of the accused, James P Barker.

The preliminary hearing will decide whether to court-martial the four. The case is one of a series of atrocities blamed on US forces in Iraq.

Along with Sergeant Paul Cortez, Private Jesse Spielman, and Private Bryan Howard, Specialist Barker is charged with rape and murder.

The four are alleged to have helped a former private - Steven Green, who has since left the army - plan, carry out and cover up the attack. Mr Green has pleaded not guilty in a federal court and will be tried separately in the US.

A fifth soldier is alleged to have lied to cover up for his colleagues.

Investigator Benjamin Bierce interviewed Mr Barker, 23, on 30 June and took down his statement, he told the hearing at a US military base in Baghdad.

On the day of the attack the soldiers had been drinking Iraqi whisky mixed with an energy drink and practising golf strokes at a checkpoint south of Baghdad, Mr Barker's statement said.

One of the soldiers, Steven Green, said he "wanted to go to a house and kill some Iraqis," it alleged.

The four eventually went to a house about 200 metres (yards) away and put the parents and their five-year old daughter in the bedroom, but kept the older girl in the living room.

According to Mr Barker's statement, he and Mr Cortez took it in turns to rape or attempt to rape her.

Mr Barker heard shots from the bedroom, and Steven Green emerged with an AK-47 in his hand saying "They're all dead. I just killed them."

According to the testimony, Mr Green then also raped the girl and shot her dead.

Her body was doused in kerosene and set alight.

The first day of the hearing on Sunday saw an Iraqi army medic describe how he found the bodies of the four Iraqis.

He told prosecutors he was ill for weeks after witnessing the crime scene.

Proceedings are expected to continue for several days.


They shoot her family, 3 soldiers rape her, shoot her, then burn her body. They deserve the death penalty....through torture.

they can get away with it, they are US Soldiers :roll:

The Lover is ever drunk with love;
He is free, he is mad,
He dances with ecstasy and delight.

Caught by our own thoughts,
We worry about every little thing,
But once we get drunk on that love,
Whatever will be, will be.

ɐɥɐɥ

"Sirus" wrote:
they can get away with it, they are US Soldiers :roll:

yeah, the americans never do anything to their soldiers,
:evil:
it's only stupid people like pakistanis and afghans who give away their own people

Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

"zara" wrote:
"Sirus" wrote:
they can get away with it, they are US Soldiers :roll:

yeah, the americans never do anything to their soldiers,
:evil:
it's only stupid people like pakistanis and afghans who give away their own people

This isn't a military hearing, they are being tried in a civil court and the US public is generally a bit icey toward rapists and killers.

I'm not concerned they'll get off because nobody would be that dumb - I'm concerned that some clapping hippy anti-death penalty lefty will give them life instead of the injection they so very much deserve.

I know trials are important and everything - but seriously when it's this obvious why do they bother? It's just as easy to tie some rocks to their feet and dump them in the atlantic.

Hell I'd volunteer to do it myself - I'll even wave while they sink to the bottom... nothing will ever bring that girl and her family back... and killing the two who did it is not going to make it any easier to comprehend.

But it sure will feel great.

"Odysseus" wrote:
"zara" wrote:
"Sirus" wrote:
they can get away with it, they are US Soldiers :roll:

yeah, the americans never do anything to their soldiers,
:evil:
it's only stupid people like pakistanis and afghans who give away their own people

This isn't a military hearing, they are being tried in a civil court and the US public is generally a bit icey toward rapists and killers.

I'm not concerned they'll get off because nobody would be that [banned word] - I'm concerned that some clapping hippy anti-death penalty lefty will give them life instead of the injection they so very much deserve.

I know trials are important and everything - but seriously when it's this obvious why do they bother? It's just as easy to tie some rocks to their feet and dump them in the atlantic.

Hell I'd volunteer to do it myself - I'll even wave while they sink to the bottom... nothing will ever bring that girl and her family back... and killing the two who did it is not going to make it any easier to comprehend.

But it sure will feel great.

this isn't the first time that soldiers have been accused of rape, but hardly any of them get a good enough punishment, even if it is in a civil court.

Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

"Odysseus" wrote:
I'm not concerned they'll get off because nobody would be that [banned word] - I'm concerned that some clapping hippy anti-death penalty lefty will give them life instead of the injection they so very much deserve.

The electric chair would be sooo much better.

when they get given the injection that kills them, do they get one before that which makes them unconsious so it doesn't hurt?

Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

I've got faith in the civil courts - not military. Which is ironic because I'm in JAG...

I don't see how this case could go sour... there aren't 12 people dumb enough in this whole solar system to screw this up.

I was reading a little more about this today - the details were so disgusting I had to stop because I noticed my hands were all clinched up and I was sweating... these guys are human trash - I shouldn't even add the word "Human," they are bone chips waiting to happen, these guys actually planned this out from top to bottom - killed this girls entire family while they were raping her... so she knew they were dead, and then what did they do?

They went back to their base... and cooked chicken wings.

And through all this there was an officer who knew about it! (he's also charged) and let it happen because he "didn't know what to do" who cares at that point?! Shoot first ask questions later.

"zara" wrote:
when they get given the injection that kills them, do they get one before that which makes them unconsious so it doesn't hurt?

When this method is used, the condemned person is usually bound to a gurney and a member of the execution team positions several heart monitors on this skin. Two needles (one is a back-up) are then inserted into usable veins, usually in the inmates arms. Long tubes connect the needle through a hole in a cement block wall to several intravenous drips. The first is a harmless saline solution that is started immediately. Then, at the warden's signal, a curtain is raised exposing the inmate to the witnesses in an adjoining room. Then, the inmate is injected with sodium thiopental - an anesthetic, which puts the inmate to sleep. Next flows pavulon or pancuronium bromide, which paralyzes the entire muscle system and stops the inmate's breathing. Finally, the flow of potassium chloride stops the heart. Death results from anesthetic overdose and respiratory and cardiac arrest while the condemned person is unconscious.

"Odysseus" wrote:
I've got faith in the civil courts - not military. Which is ironic because I'm in [b]JAG[/b]...

Is that Judge Advocate General?

"Odysseus" wrote:

I don't see how this case could go sour... there aren't 12 people [banned word] enough in this whole solar system to screw this up..

Unfortunately all it takes is one.

Getting justice here will serve as a good show of force to other troops who may consider wuch things.

And also maybe as am icebreaker to the rest of the world.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

"Muslim Bro" wrote:
"zara" wrote:
when they get given the injection that kills them, do they get one before that which makes them unconsious so it doesn't hurt?

When this method is used, the condemned person is usually bound to a gurney and a member of the execution team positions several heart monitors on this skin. Two needles (one is a back-up) are then inserted into usable veins, usually in the inmates arms. Long tubes connect the needle through a hole in a cement block wall to several intravenous drips. The first is a harmless saline solution that is started immediately. Then, at the warden's signal, a curtain is raised exposing the inmate to the witnesses in an adjoining room. Then, the inmate is injected with sodium thiopental - an anesthetic, which puts the inmate to sleep. Next flows pavulon or pancuronium bromide, which paralyzes the entire muscle system and stops the inmate's breathing. Finally, the flow of potassium chloride stops the heart. Death results from anesthetic overdose and respiratory and cardiac arrest while the condemned person is unconscious.

so it doesn't hurt them? what's the point?

Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

"zara" wrote:
so it doesn't hurt them? [b]what's the point?[/b]

To kill them....to make sure that they don't commit the crime again.

Medical ethics preclude doctors from participating in executions. However, a doctor will certify the inmate is dead. This lack of medical participation can be problematic because often injections are performed by inexperienced technicians or orderlies. If a member of the execution team injects the drugs into a muscle instead of a vein, or if the needle becomes clogged, extreme pain can result. Many prisoners have damaged veins resulting from intravenous drug use and it is sometimes difficult to find a usable vein, resulting in long delays while the inmate remains strapped to the gurney.

"Muslim Bro" wrote:
"zara" wrote:
so it doesn't hurt them? [b]what's the point?[/b]

To kill them....to make sure that they don't commit the crime again.

Medical ethics preclude doctors from participating in executions. However, a doctor will certify the inmate is dead. This lack of medical participation can be problematic because often injections are performed by inexperienced technicians or orderlies. If a member of the execution team injects the drugs into a muscle instead of a vein, or if the needle becomes clogged, extreme pain can result. Many prisoners have damaged veins resulting from intravenous drug use and it is sometimes difficult to find a usable vein, resulting in long delays while the inmate remains strapped to the gurney.

yeah, but aren't they supposed to die a painful death?

Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

"zara" wrote:
what's the point?

In a religious context, the point is to return them to god. WHen crimes are to vile for wordly punishments, they are returned to god to His (swt) judgement.

The actual death sentence is just the means.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

"zara" wrote:
yeah, but aren't they supposed to die a painful death?

Completely the opposite.

In the US more states have chosen to execute people using lethal injection is because it's [i]less[/i] painful.

"Muslim Bro" wrote:
"zara" wrote:
when they get given the injection that kills them, do they get one before that which makes them unconsious so it doesn't hurt?

When this method is used, the condemned person is usually bound to a gurney and a member of the execution team positions several heart monitors on this skin. Two needles (one is a back-up) are then inserted into usable veins, usually in the inmates arms. Long tubes connect the needle through a hole in a cement block wall to several intravenous drips. The first is a harmless saline solution that is started immediately. Then, at the warden's signal, a curtain is raised exposing the inmate to the witnesses in an adjoining room. Then, the inmate is injected with sodium thiopental - an anesthetic, which puts the inmate to sleep. Next flows pavulon or pancuronium bromide, which paralyzes the entire muscle system and stops the inmate's breathing. Finally, the flow of potassium chloride stops the heart. Death results from anesthetic overdose and respiratory and cardiac arrest while the condemned person is unconscious.

"Odysseus" wrote:
I've got faith in the civil courts - not military. Which is ironic because I'm in [b]JAG[/b]...

Is that Judge Advocate General?

Yes

The Constitution prohibits what is called "cruel and unusual punishment" which means we cannot inflict physical harm on a prisoner even in an execution.

I don't think any level of torture would ever equal what these guys did - and reveling in it seems perverse, kind of an endorsement of enjoying inflicting pain on people. Deactivate them I say, they don't deserve to breathe.

"Odysseus" wrote:
The Constitution prohibits what is called "cruel and unusual punishment" which means we cannot inflict physical harm on a prisoner even in an execution.

Death by electrocution & firing squad....wouldn't you call that cruel?

"Odysseus" wrote:
I don't think any level of torture would ever equal what these guys did - and reveling in it seems perverse, kind of an endorsement of enjoying inflicting pain on people. Deactivate them I say, [b]they don't deserve to breathe[/b].

Execution using the gas chamber maybe....

Pages