I'm just using this post to learn. 

You can stop reading if you like.

Cause I will make no sense to you at all. 

Unless you're TPOS/Psychology student/Ex-Psychology student.

-

Triplett – Fishing reel

Zajonc – Cockroaches

Michaels – Pool players

Asch – Lines

Perrin & Spencer – Young offenders

Perrin & Spencer – Repeat 40 years later

Gerard et al – Private answer

Jenness – Beans in jar

Sheriff – Light moving

Milgram – Voltage 65%

Bickman – Clothing 40>80%

Hofling – Nurses 21/22

Adorno – Authoritarian personality

Hyman & Sheatsly – Poor education

Kilhem & Mann – 16% female, 40% male

Hamilton – Personal responsibility

Oliner – Jews, empathy

Baurmind – Lack of consent, deception, harm in Milgram

-

Gestalt law of Pragnanz

Navon- Part whole principle

Rubins Vase/Neckers Cube

Ponzo – Converging & Muller-Lyer – Arrow

Gibson – Data driven, line, shadow, texture, affordances

Gregory – Knowledge of world, beliefs, experience, expectation

Neisser- Both are right, depends on situation

Bower- Infants & Perceiving distance

Gilchrist & Nesburg – Motivation, Hunger- colour and brightness

Bruner & Mintern – Expectation, 13 number v. B letter

McGuinnies – Emotion, Recognition of offensive words

Seagall et all – Cuture, Western more susceptible to ML illusion

-

Watson & Raynor – Little Albert

DiNardo – Bites from dogs

Lang & Lazovik – Phobia of snake Systematic desensitisation

Freud – Little Hans

Eysenck – Psychodynamic 44, Eclectic 64, None 66

Barlow- No purpose behind rituals

Gilbert – OCD patients bigger thalmi, Drugs reduce size

Salloway & Duffy – Increased activity in OFC

Pauls – 10% relative, 2% general population

Julien – Drugs 50-80%

Dougherty –Surgery32%

Cottreaux – Similar between EPR and Cog Therapy, after year EPR better

-

The vastness of the mind in comprehending all this.

In a short space of time.

Under pressure.