NO TOPIC

Nazwould you rather
a) be stuck in a cave with a wild tiger OR
b) lick peanut butter off a homosexuals foot

Any sane person would choose option b...if their foot was washed before the peanut butter was applied ofcourse 😂

I watched dispatches on channel 4 last night.
I was really angry at channel for giving Islam a bad image. Islam is a most peaceful religion on earth. They allowed a terrorist to give his reasons for bombing Kaafirs. Thing that upset me was that the Wahhabi boy was referring to my holy Quran. How dare he twist versus out of context to justify killing people in Britain. I am well angry with channel 4 because they give a terrorist live air time to present Islam is a very negative character. Does anyone know email of that producer?

Details are given here.

MPAC

MuslimBroAny sane person would choose option b...if their foot was washed before the peanut butter was applied ofcourse :lol:

well that makes me insane lol. Well if you think about it if i was stuck in a cave with a wild tiger, to stop it eating me, i would get the mud from around the cave an apply it to myself. That way the tiger wont smell my human meatly flesh and try to eat me. It will be deceived by the smell of the mud. Now i just have to think about how im gonna get out of there lol.

Naz

MuslimBroAny sane person would choose option b...if their foot was washed before the peanut butter was applied ofcourse :lol:

well that makes me insane lol. Well if you think about it if i was stuck in a cave with a wild tiger, to stop it eating me, i would get the mud from around the cave an apply it to myself. That way the tiger wont smell my human meatly flesh and try to eat me. It will be deceived by the smell of the mud. Now i just have to think about how im gonna get out of there lol.

have u been watching Predator with Arnold Swartzneggar?

i don't see whythe grossness of eating peanut butter off someone's foot is affected by their sexuality. if it was to eat off another part of the homosexual's body.... then i'd understand lol.

the only reason i wouldn't pick option B is if i was allergic to peanuts!

Ya'qub

Naz

MuslimBroAny sane person would choose option b...if their foot was washed before the peanut butter was applied ofcourse :lol:

well that makes me insane lol. Well if you think about it if i was stuck in a cave with a wild tiger, to stop it eating me, i would get the mud from around the cave an apply it to myself. That way the tiger wont smell my human meatly flesh and try to eat me. It will be deceived by the smell of the mud. Now i just have to think about how im gonna get out of there lol.

have u been watching Predator with Arnold Swartzneggar?

i don't see whythe grossness of eating peanut butter off someone's foot is affected by their sexuality. if it was to eat off another part of the homosexual's body.... then i'd understand lol.

the only reason i wouldn't pick option B is if i was allergic to peanuts!

cant stand Arnold Swartzneggar movies, the guy just cannot act!
I dont have a problemo with it being a homosexual foot its just the foot in general i have a problemo with.

in Predator he covers himself in mud so an alien with dread-locks who can go invisible can't see him.

and yes...feet are icky. but being ripped into pieces by tigers is presumably worse than icky!

Tiger in a Cave... anytime.

I get on with all gods creatures. Its an animal thing.

If anyone even comes near me with a penut butter foot (homo or otherwise) i'll snap their ankle :twisted: and make them lick it.

Ya'qubin Predator he covers himself in mud so an alien with dread-locks who can go invisible can't see him.

and yes...feet are icky. but being ripped into pieces by tigers is presumably worse than icky!

actually i lie i have seen that movie just forgot. Yeah being ripped into tiny bits is not pleasant hence why i said the mud will stop the human fleshy smell travelling into the direction of the tigers nostrils. Now that you mention it mud could be a good camurflage technique 😃

Seraphim If anyone even comes near me with a penut butter foot (homo or otherwise) i'll snap their ankle :twisted: and make them lick it.

😂

Satan has no chance against God.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6834239,00.html

Shiite cleric says U.S. is desperate for victory after its failure in the region

Tue Aug 7, 11:33 PM ET

Lebanon's most senior Shiite Muslim cleric Tuesday called U.S. intervention in Lebanon part of a desperate attempt for victory in the region after its "failures in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine."

Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah was commenting on last week's announcement by President Bush that the U.S. will freeze the assets of people deemed to be undermining Lebanon's government.

"The American administration is trying to achieve any gain in the shadow of the embarrassment hitting it because of its failures in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine after the failure of Israel's war on Lebanon and the retreat of America's project in the region," Fadlallah said in a statement.

The Hezbollah-led opposition in Lebanon has been locked in a fierce power struggle with the Western-backed government of Fuad Saniora. The opposition's main demand has been the formation of a national unity Cabinet that would give the opposition veto power. Saniora, backed by the anti-Syrian parliamentary majority and the U.S., rejects the opposition's demand.

Syria had significant control over Lebanon before its troops were forced to leave in 2005 because of international pressure following the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Many in Lebanon believe Syria was behind the killing — a charge Syria denies.

Bush's executive order targets people found to be helping Syria assert control in Lebanon or otherwise undermine the rule of law.

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/07/africa/ME-GEN-Lebanon-US-Cler…

I can’t stand a messy room. It’s usually my sister who keeps our bedroom looking immaculate – even though it’s her that usually makes the mess too.

And one thing we cant never keep tidy is our plug area – me and my sister have three different phones between us – which means three different chargers, a laptop charger, a crimper/straightner and curling iron charger, my electric toothbrush charger, my sisters Ipod charger/lead thingy…and a fan that we have out most nights. All of which get used on a daily basis. All of which get tangled up on a daily basis.

Even four plugs are not enough for half of this stuff.

dnt u have a extension wire? we have stuff plugged in all over the house. reg. messy bedrooms, boy do I hate sharing with my sister, she’s so messy!!! her books, bags, clothes are everywhere. the girls stuff dunt seem to finish, they keep on coming and coming!

are there any itch tablets a person can take to get rid of itchiness?

We do....problem is our plug is bang in the middle of the room. so all the chargers are totally noticable.

Also, we have about 7 wardrobes in our room (two mine, four for my two younger sisters, and one for our books) and they ALL are full length mirrors.

So, on a daily basis you see makeup and fingerprint smudges on them - (you cant open a door without touching the mirror) and dust gathers quickly on them.

I leave early and return late on most days. My room is always immaculate when I come home (my sister has cleaned it) and its always a tip when I go to sleep (again my sisters mess).

Noorare there any itch tablets a person can take to get rid of itchiness?

Didnt know there was such a thing.

But perhaps oil/cream may relieve the itchyness.

I now have my own room after driving my sister out. She was sooo messy it drove me up the wall, so one day she got sick of my pestering and packed her bags and now kips downstairs :oops:

Noorare there any itch tablets a person can take to get rid of itchiness?

do i dare ask where this itchiness is 😂

Oh, and also what three verbs would you use to describe The Revival?

errrrm
educates
humorous
exposure

^^^They are adjectives, verbs are doing words. Anyway, think admin meant adjectives :?

Noor^^^They are adjectives, verbs are doing words. Anyway, think admin meant adjectives :?

Even though I'm an award-winning author, I STILL for the life of me can't ever remember the difference between nouns, verbs, pronouns, adverbs, prefixes, modal particles, puctuation, definate articles, tenses or just plain words.

I still enjoy pointing out people's grammatical errors.

Noor^^^They are adjectives, verbs are doing words. Anyway, think admin meant adjectives :?

Oh right. Well in that case you cant really use verbs to describe the revival so im gonna modify what admin said. Describe the revival using 3 adjectives. 😃

Ya'qubEven though I'm an award-winning author, I STILL for the life of me can't ever remember the difference between nouns, verbs, pronouns, adverbs, prefixes, modal particles, puctuation, definate articles, tenses or just plain words.

I still enjoy pointing out people's grammatical errors.

lol me neither

pakistan zindabad (long live pakistan) 😃

Nazpakistan zindabad (long live pakistan) :D

Yeah, Happy 14th August everyone.

Pakistan i now what 60 years old?

my grandad's older than your country! :twisted:

Ya'qubmy grandad's older than your country! :twisted:

So is my grandma... infact she was actually there during the partition from India.

As I was driving down Green St. I saw some pakis (girls and boys) blowing their horns and waving their flag and I was thinking like they lost in cricket so what are they doing. Only after watching the news did I realise that it's Pakistan's 60th anniversary.

So was anyone else celebrating?

I must say there was a large police presence even though there was a tiny number of people celebrating.

didnt celebrate, didnt thik most ppl did. If anyone should be celebrating it should be our parents and grandparents coz they are from pak. I hate it when ppl go around waving the pak flag, you see it alot on eid, what is the point!

Pakistan's circular history

The story of Pakistan is one of remorseless tug and pull between the civilian and military rulers on the one hand, and the liberal and religious forces on the other.

In the process, the country has failed to become either a democracy, a theocracy or a permanent military dictatorship.

The chief casualties have been the rule of law, the state institutions and the process of national integration, with grave consequences for the civil society.

The "Talebanisation" of the north-western region is one manifestation of the prevalent disorder; an unending separatist campaign by nationalists in the south-western Balochistan province is another.

Meanwhile, sectarian and ethnic tensions have kept the two largest provinces - namely Punjab, which is the bread-basket of the country, and Sindh, which is its trading and industrial mainstay - perennially instable.

How and why did all this come about?

Hybrid system

The country was born in 1947 with a clean slate and a potential to follow in one of two directions.

It could opt for democracy. It had inherited democratic institutions and experience from the colonial rule, and was itself the creation of a democratic process involving national elections, parliamentary resolutions and a referendum.

Or it could become an Islamic emirate. The Pakistan movement was based on the theory that the Muslims of India were a nation and had a right to separate statehood.

They were granted separate electorate by the British rulers, and used Islamic identity as their main election slogan in 1937 and 1946.

But instead of making a clear choice, the early leaders tried to mix the two, and inadvertently sparked a series of political, legal and religious debacles that define today's Pakistan.

In political terms, democracy has been the first casualty of this hybrid system.

Its foundations were shaken by two controversial decisions made by the country's founder and first Governor-General, Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

He dismissed the Congress-led government of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) by decree, and instead of ordering fresh elections, appointed a Muslim League leader as the chief minister with the mandate to whip up parliamentary support for himself.

Secondly, he declared to a large Bengali speaking audience in Dhaka, the capital of East Pakistan, that Urdu would be the only state language.

Alienation

The first action created a precedent for Governor-General Ghulam Mohammad, a former bureaucrat, to dismiss the country's first civilian government in 1953.

Since then, the governor-generals, presidents and army chiefs have dismissed as many as ten civilian governments that together ruled the country for 27 years. The remaining 33 years have seen direct military rule.

Mr Jinnah's second action alienated the Bengali population of the eastern wing, and set a precedent for the West Pakistani rulers to neutralise the numerical superiority of East Pakistan through legal entrapments and outright disenfranchisement.

After the secession of East Pakistan in 1971, the military rulers have repeatedly vitiated the federal and parliamentary character of the 1973 Constitution, thereby alienating the three smaller provinces of the remaining country.

Legal safeguards against tyranny fell by the wayside in 1954 when the Supreme Court justified the governor-general's dismissal of the government and the parliament by invoking the controversial 'theory of necessity'.

The theory has endured, and nearly every dismissal of a civilian government and every military takeover have been upheld by the higher judiciary, undermining democratic traditions.

On their part, the military rulers have co-opted both surrogate politicians and religious extremists as instruments of political strategy and national security policy.

The political recruits have provided a civilian façade to military governments, while religious - and sometimes ethnic - extremists have tended to distract and destabilise governments run by secular political forces.

Aid to dictators

Last, but not least, the Americans have tended to use their crucial financial and military support selectively against democratic governments.

The pattern is unmistakably clear.

The first large-scale American food and military aid started to pour into Pakistan in late 1953, months after the dismissal of its first civilian government.

It continued for a decade as Pakistan under a military regime joined various US-sponsored defence pacts against the Soviet Union.

The US started having problems with Pakistan when an elected government came to power in 1972, but poured billions of dollars into the country when another military regime took over in 1977 and agreed to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Similarly, while the elected governments that followed during 1988-99 had to live with a decade of US sanctions, the military regime of Gen Musharraf, that ousted the last civilian government in 1999, remains a 'well supplied' ally in the US' 'war on terror'.

There are, however, indications that the Americans may finally be getting fed up with Gen Musharraf, just as they got fed up with General Ayub Khan when he started to warm up to the Soviet Union after the 1965 war with India, or of General Zia-ul Haq when the Soviets decided to withdraw troops from Afghanistan in 1987.

There is also a gathering political storm on the horizon, in keeping with the cyclical pattern of the country's political weather.

As elections approach, exiled leaders Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, both former prime ministers, threaten to return to the country with the express aim of effecting a regime change.

But Gen Musharraf, like his predecessors, is fighting to keep his military office and his special powers under the constitution to dismiss governments and parliaments.

Thus, the story of Pakistan continues to be one of despotic regimes using religious extremists and external support to keep the secular democratic forces at bay; and when these forces do assert themselves, to tie them down in legal constraints that are designed to ensure their failure.

It is the story of a society that has been going round in circles for the last 60 years.

BBC News

Interesting read...

Ive noticed that there is a sister section on this forum but not a brother section? How come? There must be some stuff you lot wanna talk about between urs. Most other forums i have seen have both.

NazIve noticed that there is a sister section on this forum but not a brother section? How come? There must be some stuff you lot wanna talk about between urs. Most other forums i have seen have both.

Just becoz you cant see it doesnt mean its not there,

Only girl members can see the Sisters Section (and guys cant)

and only guy memebers can see the Guys Section (and girls cant)

and yes there is stuff we discuss...

Why the sudden interest?