Turkey in radical revision of Islamic texts

Quote:
[size=16]Turkey in radical revision of Islamic texts[/size]

Turkey is preparing to publish a document that represents a revolutionary reinterpretation of Islam - and a controversial and radical modernisation of the religion.

The country's powerful Department of Religious Affairs has commissioned a team of theologians at Ankara University to carry out a fundamental revision of the Hadith, the second most sacred text in Islam after the Koran.

The Hadith is a collection of thousands of sayings reputed to come from the Prophet Muhammad.

As such, it is the principal guide for Muslims in interpreting the Koran and the source of the vast majority of Islamic law, or Sharia.

But the Turkish state has come to see the Hadith as having an often negative influence on a society it is in a hurry to modernise, and believes it responsible for obscuring the original values of Islam.

It says that a significant number of the sayings were never uttered by Muhammad, and even some that were need now to be reinterpreted.

[b]'Reformation'[/b]

Commentators say the very theology of Islam is being reinterpreted in order to effect a radical renewal of the religion.

Its supporters say the spirit of logic and reason inherent in Islam at its foundation 1,400 years ago are being rediscovered. Some believe it could represent the beginning of a reformation in the religion.

Turkish officials have been reticent about the revision of the Hadith until now, aware of the controversy it is likely to cause among traditionalist Muslims, but they have spoken to the BBC about the project, and their ambitious aims for it.

The forensic examination of the Hadiths has taken place in Ankara University's School of Theology.

An adviser to the project, Felix Koerner, says some of the sayings - also known individually as "hadiths" - can be shown to have been invented hundreds of years after the Prophet Muhammad died, to serve the purposes of contemporary society.

"Unfortunately you can even justify through alleged hadiths, the Muslim - or pseudo-Muslim - practice of female genital mutilation," he says.

"You can find messages which say 'that is what the Prophet ordered us to do'. But you can show historically how they came into being, as influences from other cultures, that were then projected onto Islamic tradition."

The argument is that Islamic tradition has been gradually hijacked by various - often conservative - cultures, seeking to use the religion for various forms of social control.

Leaders of the Hadith project say successive generations have embellished the text, attributing their political aims to the Prophet Muhammad himself.

[b]Revolutionary[/b]

Turkey is intent on sweeping away that "cultural baggage" and returning to a form of Islam it claims accords with its original values and those of the Prophet.

But this is where the revolutionary nature of the work becomes apparent. Even some sayings accepted as being genuinely spoken by Muhammad have been altered and reinterpreted.

Prof Mehmet Gormez, a senior official in the Department of Religious Affairs and an expert on the Hadith, gives a telling example.

"There are some messages that ban women from travelling for three days or more without their husband's permission and they are genuine.

"But this isn't a religious ban. It came about because in the Prophet's time it simply wasn't safe for a woman to travel alone like that. But as time has passed, people have made permanent what was only supposed to be a temporary ban for safety reasons."

The project justifies such bold interference in the 1,400-year-old content of the Hadith by rigorous academic research.

Prof Gormez points out that in another speech, the Prophet said "he longed for the day when a woman might travel long distances alone".

So, he argues, it is clear what the Prophet's goal was.

[b]Original spirit[/b]

Yet, until now, the ban has remained in the text, and helps to restrict the free movement of some Muslim women to this day.

As part of its aggressive programme of renewal, Turkey has given theological training to 450 women, and appointed them as senior imams called "vaizes".

They have been given the task of explaining the original spirit of Islam to remote communities in Turkey's vast interior.

One of the women, Hulya Koc, looked out over a sea of headscarves at a town meeting in central Turkey and told the women of the equality, justice and human rights guaranteed by an accurate interpretation of the Koran - one guided and confirmed by the revised Hadith.

She says that, at the moment, Islam is being widely used to justify the violent suppression of women.

"There are honour killings," she explains.

"We hear that some women are being killed when they marry the wrong person or run away with someone they love.

"There's also violence against women within families, including sexual harassment by uncles and others. This does not exist in Islam... we have to explain that to them."

[b]'New Islam'[/b]

According to Fadi Hakura, an expert on Turkey from Chatham House in London, Turkey is doing nothing less than recreating Islam - changing it from a religion whose rules must be obeyed, to one designed to serve the needs of people in a modern secular democracy.

He says that to achieve it, the state is fashioning a new Islam.

"This is kind of akin to the Christian Reformation," he says.

"Not exactly the same, but if you think, it's changing the theological foundations of [the] religion. "

Fadi Hakura believes that until now secularist Turkey has been intent on creating a new politics for Islam.

Now, he says, "they are trying to fashion a new Islam."

Significantly, the "Ankara School" of theologians working on the new Hadith have been using Western critical techniques and philosophy.

They have also taken an even bolder step - rejecting a long-established rule of Muslim scholars that later (and often more conservative) texts override earlier ones.

"You have to see them as a whole," says Fadi Hakura.

"You can't say, for example, that the verses of violence override the verses of peace. This is used a lot in the Middle East, this kind of ideology.

"I cannot impress enough how fundamental [this change] is."

[url= News[/url]

My friend jsut emailed me the same news story.

I say good news! it is now using Ijtihad, in the way Tariq Ramadan calls for.

Of course this needs to be done in the 'right' way, and not for political gain of a particular group. This is where the corruption in modern Turkey frightens me a little bit.

Time will tell...

Can't really make a judgement call without anything to judge but this bit was surprising:

Some of the examples in the article are poor - they (in most cases) sound like are what educated muslims believe anyway (as opposed to those who have not studied Islam and may mistake local culture for Islam.)

Quote:
They have also taken an even bolder step - rejecting a long-established rule of Muslim scholars that later (and often more conservative) texts override earlier ones.

I thought the opposite was the case - go as early as possible. If they are doing that, where is the revolution?

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

This cannot be a good thing.

Firstly because this is Turkey we are talking about. All Turkey wants is to join the EU and it cannot do that unless it becomes 'modernised'. It stems from secularist, Kemal Ataturk, who thought Islam was a problem and that religion was incompatible with modern societies.

BBC News wrote:
But the Turkish state has come to see the Hadith as having an often negative influence on a society it is in a hurry to modernise, and believes it responsible for obscuring the original values of Islam.

BBC News wrote:
"Unfortunately you can even justify through alleged hadiths, the Muslim - or pseudo-Muslim - practice of female genital mutilation," he says.

Change the word 'circumcision' to 'mutilation' and you get a different meaning.

BBC News wrote:
"There are some messages that ban women from travelling for three days or more without their husband's permission and they are genuine.

"But this isn't a religious ban. It came about because in the Prophet's time it simply wasn't safe for a woman to travel alone like that. But as time has passed, people have made permanent what was only supposed to be a temporary ban for safety reasons."

Yet, until now, the ban has remained in the text, and helps to restrict the free movement of some Muslim women to this day.


Unfortunately there are many 'modernists' living in Turkey. There are many Sahih Hadith saying the same thing and it is a general consensus among scholars that women cannot travel for three days or more alone but the Turkish 'scholars' for some reason seem to think otherwise. The only thing scholars disagree with is the exact distance.

BBC News wrote:
One of the women, Hulya Koc, looked out over a sea of headscarves at a town meeting in central Turkey and told the women of the equality, justice and human rights guaranteed by an accurate interpretation of the Koran - one guided and confirmed by the revised Hadith.

She says that, at the moment, Islam is being widely used to justify the violent suppression of women.

"There are honour killings," she explains.

"We hear that some women are being killed when they marry the wrong person or run away with someone they love.

"There's also violence against women within families, including sexual harassment by uncles and others. This does not exist in Islam... we have to explain that to them."


So the woman is saying that the current Hadith encourages honour killings, sexual harassment, violence, ect?

It will be interesting to see the list of the scholars they have rejected.

A friend of mine sent me this response. i have no idea what it means! Can anyone help?

Quote:
I have to say that I doubt there will be anything new.

Unfortunately studies in Turkey usually have a

political agenda and jump on the bandwagon of

revisionism obviously in line with the secular

tradition of the government.

It would be very difficult to see any more inroads on

this topic that is outside the framework of academic

tradition in the Orientalist literature. I mean what

are they going to add to the works Schacht ,Juynboll,

Wansborough, Herbet Berg, Michael Cook and Crone?

Just reminds me of the usual media hype on inadequate

results all for the sake of this glorified goal to

"revise Islam". Reminds me of the Atlantic Monthly

article on Puin's revisions and the Sanaa manuscripts.

Nothing came out of that one and dont think anything

new will come out here.

Sorry modernists lol!

Don't just do something! Stand there.

[b]BBC claims of hadith reworking unfounded [/b]

As a Directorate of Religious Affairs project nears completion, a resurgence in Western media coverage on the topic, including a BBC report, has focused on an alleged Turkish attempt to re-invent Islam to suit the political aims of the secular republic -- but the directorate says that the project is a return, not a re-creation.

Turkey's Directorate of Religious Affairs launched the "Thematic Hadith Project" in 2006 to re-evaluate the hadith, the second most important source of jurisprudence in Islam after the Quran, with the objective of determining incorrect hadith attributed to the Prophet Mohammed, correctly interpreting misinterpreted ones and re-explaining certain hadith so that they may be better understood by Muslims.

A recent BBC report, titled "Turkey in radical revision of Islamic texts," asserts that the Turkish directorate's project is of a "revolutionary nature" and has "altered and reinterpreted" prophetic statements heretofore agreed upon as authentic. Speaking with Today's Zaman on Wednesday, Dr. Mehmet Görmez, the directorate's deputy director, said: "Our project is not aimed at effecting a radical renewal of the religion, as is claimed by the BBC. Our objective is to help our citizens attain a better understanding of the hadith. Though I underlined several times during our interview with a BBC reporter that our project cannot be considered a reformation of Islam, he distorted the facts, saying Turkey is preparing to publish a document that represents a revolutionary reinterpretation of Islam -- and a controversial and radical modernization of the religion."

An attempt to alter these texts as part of a "radical modernization of the religion," as the BBC put it, would certainly be a highly controversial move. The online BBC article alone had generated over 1,500 reader comments as of Thursday evening. For many Muslims, though, there is a crucial difference between altering hadith texts and reinterpreting them.

A fresh look at the hadith collections -- the gathering of which began some 200 years after the death of the Prophet Mohammed -- and how they are utilized and interpreted within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence, while sure to generate a degree of criticism and controversy, is a far cry from attempting to change, in effect, some of Islam's most important historical records.

The directorate vehemently denies that it is attempting to create a new form of Islam for secular Turkey or for political motives, as the BBC report suggests. Instead, it contends that it is taking a long-overdue look at the classical sources of Islam, contextually re-evaluating them for the 21st century to ensure that the texts can continue to be a guiding, relevant spiritual source for Turkey's millions of Muslims. In essence, a return to an original form of Islam that has been diluted over the centuries by various developments.

[url='s Zaman[/url]