End Of Times And Arrival of Imam Mehdi

sydkhan —

NO need to download just stream through.

In English[by harun yahya]:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7956471036957620412&q=end+of+ti…

---------------------------------------------------------------
Urdu(or)Hindi
[i strongly recommend this if you can understand the language]:

Its By Tahir ul qadari well knowed alim e deen from Pakistan.

Part 1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8367224917862883907&q=end+of+t…

Part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3088539938509115042&q=end+of+ti…

English [by harun yahya]

The Signs of last day.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6453511069221761247&q=signs+of…

These videos are very very educational.

Forum
General

Adil — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 - 18:51

Just seen the beginning of the clip.

Why has Hadrat Mahdi got "alayhis salaam" written after him? I thought the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah did not do this but rather another people of falsehood did.

EDIT: This has won you a ban. It seems harsh but you're lucky you were even allowed to post for this long.
----------- Modnster

Seraphim — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 - 18:53

AdilJust seen the beginning of the clip.

Why has Hadrat Mahdi got "alayhis salaam" written after him? I thought the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah did not do this but rather another people of falsehood did.

Im pretty certain that there was something mentioned in the regards to the end of time conflict about the arrival of false prophets.

Adil — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 - 18:56

Seraphim

AdilJust seen the beginning of the clip.

Why has Hadrat Mahdi got "alayhis salaam" written after him? I thought the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah did not do this but rather another people of falsehood did.

Im pretty certain that there was something mentioned in the regards to the end of time conflict about the arrival of false prophets.

Sorry - you've confused me. Whats the dajjals got to do with my post?

Maybe its obvious connection but I cant see what it is.

Kindly explain.

Seraphim — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 - 18:58

Adil

Seraphim
AdilJust seen the beginning of the clip.

Why has Hadrat Mahdi got "alayhis salaam" written after him? I thought the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah did not do this but rather another people of falsehood did.

Im pretty certain that there was something mentioned in the regards to the end of time conflict about the arrival of false prophets.

Sorry - you've confused me. Whats the dajjals got to do with my post?

Maybe its obvious connection but I cant see what it is.

Kindly explain.

never mind... its nothing really....

im prob reading way too much into all this.

{Seraph waves his hand infront of Adil in a Jedi motion} I did not say the above... you will swiftly forget what i said... and you WILL go across the street and get me some gum.

MuslimSisLilSis — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 - 19:36

Adil I thought the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah did not do this but rather another people of falsehood did.

according to u the "people of falsehood" do a lot of things :roll: :roll: :roll:

MuslimSisLilSis — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 - 22:00

*DUST*

MuslimSisLilSisthis time LilSis will have NO MERCY at all :twisted:

apparently u wont have to seeing as how he's banned... again... :roll:

??

where/when/why?

did Mr Admin just suddenly realise that he's MED?

*DUST* — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 13:33

yashmaki(as) is usually written after the names of the prophets and no where else. I don;t see what was wrong with his question either, not deserving of a ban

it was not the question itself, it never is with Med - its the way he puts across the question, with labels of 'Ahlul-Biddah' and whatnot that gets him banned... :roll:

wass786 — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 13:42

salaam

why cant i hear any voice Whenever i visit a google.video ?? :? my speakers are working perfectly. just when i go on google.video.com it never plays sound

star — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 16:15

That was a valid question.....

so how comes it said 'alahi salaam' after hadhrat mehdi ? when we all know 'alahi salaam' is only after the prophets and angels.

That ban was petty

yuit — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 17:40

najThat was a valid question.....

so how comes it said 'alahi salaam' after hadhrat mehdi ? when we all know 'alahi salaam' is only after the prophets and angels.

That ban was petty

The ban was petty i agree, but would it be to hard to ask a question just like you have now? You got more chance of getting a response as well.

star — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 18:40

There was nothing wrong with his actual Q. He asked the same way i did.

The rest of it was his thought , just made into a big deal. I believe the shi'ites say (a.s) i did not know the ahle-sunnahs did.

does that win me a ban too?

yuit — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 18:54

najThere was nothing wrong with his actual Q. He asked the same way i did.

The rest of it was his thought , just made into a big deal. I believe the shi'ites say (a.s) i did not know the ahle-sunnahs did.

does that win me a ban too?

Yes but when u ask a question you normally wait for a response, when people don't and add a statement, it normally means they making a assumption and don't really want a answer.

Giving a ban for this reason is poor I agree, but when u bring all the history as well, being allow to post again and everything, then they maybe there a reason for it. Don't really like to comment on the running of the forum, but admin is a fair man, no one will disagree with that.

star — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 19:14

ok yuit..

btw; i heard that Tahir ul qadri saab said he knows in what year the imaam mehdi is going to appear :?

Can someone shed some light on this pls.

Dave — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 19:23

najok yuit..

btw; i heard that Tahir ul qadri saab said he knows in what year the imaam mehdi is going to appear :?

Can someone shed some light on this pls.

His organization made a concerning statement about that and islamic armies being sent to 'conquer' the West.

Ironically he also made statements about preventing a clash of civilizations

Why? In light of the previous comments it seems he believes it's inevitable.

Beast — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 22:51

najok yuit..

btw; i heard that Tahir ul qadri saab said he knows in what year the imaam mehdi is going to appear :?

Can someone shed some light on this pls.

Here is a summary of a recent key lecture given by Sheikh-ul-Islam Tahir ul-Qadri:

Main points of Lecture

1. America will no longer be a super power and it will seize to have any power or importance at the time of Imam Mahdi (AS).

2. Europe will be the main superpower at that time, its capital will be Rome or Istanbul (Qustintanya).

3. India and China will be the other super powers at the time. Imam Mahdi (AS) will send armies to both Europe and India/China and conquer the lands.

4. When Imam Mahdi (AS) will conquer al-Quds, his army will do so by using 1700 warships. (Major point, as the Muslim countries barely have a few warships between them at this moment in time, so how can Imam Mahdi (AS) be here now or in the near future.)

5. Imam Mahdi (AS) will be born two to three hundred years before the Day of Qiyamah.

6. Imam Mahdi (AS) will be born in Madinah and live there until he migrates to al-Quds after he conquers it. He will die at the age of 80.

7. Dajjal will be a man living in Asfahan - between Syria and Iraq- he will have two eyes, one of which will be blind, the other eye will be popping out like a grape. He will have kaf, fa, Ra, - kafir - written on his forehead which everyone will be able to read.

8. Dajjal will claim to be a prophet and then later on claim to be god.

9. The munafiqs/hypocrites of Madinah will all leave Madinah and go and join Dajjal. The believers in Madinah will join Imam Mahdi (AS).

10. The year of the birth of Imam Mahdi (AS) is 204. The ‘thousand year’ in which that will be is not given. So the earliest Imam Mahdi (AS) will be born is on 2204 AH. It could also be 3204AH, 4204 AH, 5204 AH etc. So there are at least 774 years until Imam Mahdi (AS) can be born.

Minhaj.org

He doesn't say that he knows the year exactly.

iRazor — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 - 23:59

Augustus

His organization made a concerning statement about that and islamic armies being sent to 'conquer' the West.

Ironically he also made statements about preventing a clash of civilizations

Why? In light of the previous comments it seems he believes it's inevitable.

Your American Attitude Just shined bright there.

If America can send Armies to conquer Iraq, afghanistan, and soon Iran and probably Syria, (thought they'd have gone for Libya long ago) etc. All in the name of fighting terrorism, then why can't another super-power, send an army to conquer America, who they may view as a terrorist.

In no way am I actually justifying any type of war, im just sayin, if I kicked you, you should be allowed to kick me back right?

And, in regards to what you think is a contradiction, or ironic. The statement about "conquering the West" isnt a statement. It is rather information being relayed, information you may look up in islamic traditions. Muslims believe that there will come Imam Mehdi, who will unite the muslims and the muslims nations will come under one umbrella. I havent yet listened to the speech regarding the "conquering of the west" yet. So I cannot comment upon that.

Regarding the Clash of civilisations, and a call of prevention, it is regarding the mayhem the cartoons have caused recently, and the statment it seems is calling for muslims to be civilised about the matter.

And please dont take what ive said outta context and call me an "Islamist Muslimist Jihadist Extremist Fundamentalist", cuz I see those terms as anti-semitic on part of the media.

You — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 - 00:19

I have a question about all these futuristic wars.

Will they be right?

I have not gone into detail, and would not slander Imam mahdi (whatever should go here as a sign of respect) in any way.

But there will be more parties. whenever I have read such things, there is never an explanation of wether it would be the right thing to do, but that this will happen.

(and regarding prediction of Shaykh Tahirul Qadri, I have no idea, but someone mentioned something relating to a wait of atleast 700 years as suggested by his speech... I have not heard it, butI know how people take things out of context easily. And since the topic dpes not really concern me, I have not looked into it.)

Angel — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 - 00:25

AdminI have a question about all these futuristic wars.

Will they be right?

Do u mean the ones Imam Mahdi (as) will be fightin?

If you think about it, the Holy Prophet ﷺ has made many references to Imam Mahdi (as) and he has also called him his son, (cnt rember references) so obviously this is predicted by Islam. Also Imam Mahdi (as) will be taking the Holy Prophet ﷺ as his role model and the wars will be conducted so in a fair and just way.

Also there is a hadith that says in the time of Imam Mahdi (as), it will be the most peaceful years this world will have when under his control.

P.s. as a side note to one of the question, doesnt (as) mean peace be upon him, dont we also send peace on the family of the Holy Prophet (saw), so what diff, does it make to put (as) after Imam Mahdi's (as) name?

You — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 - 01:16

To angle; Dunno.

For the family, and others I think we use (ra - which I think means may god be please with him/her/them.). No idea if its wrong to use (as), or not.

*DUST* — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 - 13:39

razorAnd please dont take what ive said outta context and call me an "Islamist Muslimist Jihadist Extremist Fundamentalist", cuz I see those terms as anti-semitic on part of the media.

😂

Angel — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 - 14:53

*DUST*

razorAnd please dont take what ive said outta context and call me an "Islamist Muslimist Jihadist Extremist Fundamentalist", cuz I see those terms as anti-semitic on part of the media.

:lol:

LOL thanks for pointin that out Dust, dunno how the hell i missed that, bad thing is i am in the middle of the library tryin to stop from laughin out!

Guest — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 - 17:43

A friend of a friend is a disciple of one of the Imams of Masjid-al-Aqsa. I think it is a Dijani or someink order they folow. They go to Jerusalem every year to meet their Sheikh.

According to him the spiritual circles in Jerusalem hav already sensed a disturbance in the force and they say the time is near of of his coming......................

Some even say that he has already been born........................

Don't know how much of this to beleve.......................

Dave — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 - 20:27

razorYour American Attitude Just shined bright there.

If America can send Armies to conquer Iraq, afghanistan, and soon Iran and probably Syria, (thought they'd have gone for Libya long ago) etc. All in the name of fighting terrorism, then why can't another super-power, send an army to conquer America, who they may view as a terrorist.

In no way am I actually justifying any type of war, im just sayin, if I kicked you, you should be allowed to kick me back right?

And, in regards to what you think is a contradiction, or ironic. The statement about "conquering the West" isnt a statement. It is rather information being relayed, information you may look up in islamic traditions. Muslims believe that there will come Imam Mehdi, who will unite the muslims and the muslims nations will come under one umbrella. I havent yet listened to the speech regarding the "conquering of the west" yet. So I cannot comment upon that.

Regarding the Clash of civilisations, and a call of prevention, it is regarding the mayhem the cartoons have caused recently, and the statment it seems is calling for muslims to be civilised about the matter.

And please dont take what ive said outta context and call me an "Islamist Muslimist Jihadist Extremist Fundamentalist", cuz I see those terms as anti-semitic on part of the media.

Razor it sounds like you are reacting rather than analyzing.

The talking points of Mr. Qadri's speech provided by Mr. Qadri's organization, state that a muslim leader acting in the name of Islam will rise up and conquer Europe and China. Yet at the same time he wants to prevent a Clash of Civilizations.

Perhaps I am misreading what is clearly written in point 3, or maybe my "American Attitude" prevents me from understanding your "Islamist Muslimist Jihadist Extremist Fundamentalist" intepretation of it, but it seems to me an army of muslims intent on going to Europe and China to "conquer the lands" is a clash of civilizations.

A rather epic one at that.