Submitted by *DUST* on 27 January, 2006 - 12:10 #31
"2" wrote:
"Seraphim" wrote:
Judda's putting togeather a hitlist
Nah I’m just curious
Is the whole team from the same sect?
Do you have any Salafis
The Revival has made it clear from the start that it is a NON-SECTARIAN organisation. (i.e. we have members from many nationalites and sects but we do not differentiate when it comes to the magazine)
—
[size=9]I NEVER WORE IT BECAUSE OF THE TALIBAN, MOTHER. I LIKE THE [b]MODESTY[/b] AND [b]PROTECTION[/b] IT AFFORDS ME FROM THE EYES OF MEN.[/size] [url=http://www.adherents.com/lit/comics/Dust.html]Dust, X-Men[/url]
Submitted by judda on 27 January, 2006 - 12:11 #32
it dont sound non sectrian to me :?
its got too much shirk for my liking
—
What you put in the hearts of others; is what goes back into your own heart…
Submitted by *DUST* on 27 January, 2006 - 12:11 #33
"2" wrote:
it dont sound non sectrian to me :?
its got too much shirk for my liking
everythings got too much shirk for your liking. :roll:
—
[size=9]I NEVER WORE IT BECAUSE OF THE TALIBAN, MOTHER. I LIKE THE [b]MODESTY[/b] AND [b]PROTECTION[/b] IT AFFORDS ME FROM THE EYES OF MEN.[/size] [url=http://www.adherents.com/lit/comics/Dust.html]Dust, X-Men[/url]
Submitted by Sajid Iqbal on 27 January, 2006 - 20:13 #34
"exHT" wrote:
it dont sound non sectrian to me :?
its got too much shirk for my liking
u got no homework to do, kiddo ?
ok from the three isues of the magazines produced, give me 1 example of shirk?
This appears to be the wrong time since we're in the middle of a civil war it seems - but what is the relationship between the forum and the magazine/website?
I was under the impression the pecking order puts admin just under Sajid, but now i'm getting the impression Admin is king of the forum and Sajid is king of the magazine/website...
He is editor of the Magazine, and thus it is his domain.
He can take charge of the website if he wants.
[EDIT]
Sorry everyone for the bad language, but Ed should not stoop to a low level to reply. He has moderating priviledges. If he takes issue with someone breaking the rules, he should use his powers instead of breaking the rules himself.
[EDIT 2]
And its not a civil war, but just a single exchange, where I moderated his post as it was unnacceptable.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
I was under the impression the pecking order puts admin just under Sajid, but now i'm getting the impression Admin is king of the forum and Sajid is king of the magazine/website...
I was under the impression the pecking order puts admin just under Sajid, but now i'm getting the impression Admin is king of the forum and Sajid is king of the magazine/website...
that is correct
That is true.
But I have free reign on the online department. Something which may change very soon.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
The Revival has made it clear from the start that it is a NON-SECTARIAN organisation. (i.e. we have members from many nationalites and sects but we do not differentiate when it comes to the magazine)
[size=9]I NEVER WORE IT BECAUSE OF THE TALIBAN, MOTHER. I LIKE THE [b]MODESTY[/b] AND [b]PROTECTION[/b] IT AFFORDS ME FROM THE EYES OF MEN.[/size] [url=http://www.adherents.com/lit/comics/Dust.html]Dust, X-Men[/url]
it dont sound non sectrian to me :?
its got too much shirk for my liking
What you put in the hearts of others; is what goes back into your own heart…
everythings got too much shirk for your liking. :roll:
[size=9]I NEVER WORE IT BECAUSE OF THE TALIBAN, MOTHER. I LIKE THE [b]MODESTY[/b] AND [b]PROTECTION[/b] IT AFFORDS ME FROM THE EYES OF MEN.[/size] [url=http://www.adherents.com/lit/comics/Dust.html]Dust, X-Men[/url]
u got no homework to do, kiddo ?
ok from the three isues of the magazines produced, give me 1 example of shirk?
im waiting....
He just wants a rise out of you Ed - just ignore him.
Or edit his post so that everything is written backwards and there are suggestive pictures of famous gay celebrities.
He wants to have some fun with you - have some fun with him!
This appears to be the wrong time since we're in the middle of a civil war it seems - but what is the relationship between the forum and the magazine/website?
I was under the impression the pecking order puts admin just under Sajid, but now i'm getting the impression Admin is king of the forum and Sajid is king of the magazine/website...
Or is Admin numero uno?
I control everything that is online.
He is editor of the Magazine, and thus it is his domain.
He can take charge of the website if he wants.
[EDIT]
Sorry everyone for the bad language, but Ed should not stoop to a low level to reply. He has moderating priviledges. If he takes issue with someone breaking the rules, he should use his powers instead of breaking the rules himself.
[EDIT 2]
And its not a civil war, but just a single exchange, where I moderated his post as it was unnacceptable.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
So is this a partnership... who is the impetus for the Revival?
Dunno.
Everyone?
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
that is correct
Hey! You need to get your old avatar back! The cyclops wearing a motorcycle helmet
That is true.
But I have free reign on the online department. Something which may change very soon.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Why would it change? And what aspect of it is changing?
http://www.therevival.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?p=52310#52310
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Pages