No Topic (Old and now locked)

Seraphim —

Sup,

Starting again...

Chat about watever u ppl want.

Feel free to go off topic

l8r

Seraph

Forum

Dave — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 13:45

[quote="angel"]I loved the demon headmaster, it was a wicked programme!!

It does you remind u of his eyes![/quote]

ahhhh her name is Barbara L. Chase and she's the devil.

HATED me.

Fortunately we didn't see her that often

Beast — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 16:41

[quote="Constantine"]lol that's going a bit too far[/quote]

How do [i]you[/i] account for the change in Bush's abilities?

*DUST* — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 16:52

[quote="Constantine"]lol that's going a bit too far[/quote]
well i dunno bout the diagnosis, as i'm no Doc 😉 but i just meant the difference in his speech is shocking to say the least, doncha think? :?

Dave — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 17:24

lol comparing a man's performance on national television as the president as compared to on state television (which nobody watches) for a much lesser position ought to effect his performance.

The dems are always looking for Reagan Syndrome and are always willing to produce some attention starved doctor to back them up.

It's fun to believe but should be taken with a grain of salt.

You — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 19:34

In the recent debates was he not just repeating what he was being told through an ear piece?

that could explain it, as he would have to wait 'til the next few words were sent to him?

(he had a small reciever on his back, with a wire runnong up to his ear)

Dawud — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 19:52

[quote="Admin"]In the recent debates was he not just repeating what he was being told through an ear piece?

that could explain it, as he would have to wait 'til the next few words were sent to him?

(he had a small reciever on his back, with a wire runnong up to his ear)[/quote]

Well seeing asa we're talking about 'the debates' (I'm assuming you mean the Bush-Kerry ones) did anyone else notice durring one of the three Kerry had been allotted a rebuttal, and the Bush cut him off and the mediator says okay next question. and Bush goes: "NO! I want to answer this one" and totally cuts the mediator off and starts talking. I don't care if he was still president, if I was the mediator Mr Bush might of suddenly found his mike go dead. :x 😉

Beast — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 19:57

[quote="Constantine"]lol riiiiiight.

[/quote]

They ask good questions at least.

Like, how come the Penatgon lawn was unscathed? Why was security camera footage suppressed?

Dave — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 20:02

[quote="irfghan"][quote="Constantine"]lol riiiiiight.

[/quote]

They ask good questions at least.

Like, how come the Penatgon lawn was unscathed? Why was security camera footage suppressed?[/quote]

I noticed she was trying to promote her book.

With a flashy dramatic video presentation.

and "Hard Core" music.

Are you going to buy the book?

Dave — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 20:30

[quote="irfghan"]Come on Dave.

Just throw me any old explanation and I'll be happy.

So,

Lawn?

Camera footage?[/quote]

lol what exactly do you want me to answer? I wasn't there I couldn't tell you anything about the lawn - I don't even know if this woman is telling the truth or if her sources are correct.

The fact of the matter is if she is asking me to believe that an airforce jet or missile hit the Pentagon, she had better come up with something more convincing than "lots of people were confused"

Seeing as I am the only one here with a pilot's license and the only one who has been to the pentagon I can tell you two things - 1. Any idiot can fly 2 feet off the ground. It's called ground effect and believe it or not your lift is MORE EFFECTIVE in ground effect than in any other part of flight - in fact it is so easy it is dangerous to new pilots taking off because they tend to get confused and when they lift off at too low an airspeed they sometimes accidentally put themselves in a power on stall.

I can also tell you that any footage of the Pentagon HAS TO BE RELEASED BY THE GOVERNMENT. There is a simple tactical reason for that which I think is somewhat self explanatory - they cannot have people taping the pentagon looking for structural weaknesses or plotting things. I don't know what's on the footage - neither does this woman apparently, I don't even know if it's legit. But if you go to the pentagon, stand outside and start taking videos you will be asked to hand over your tapes.

The womans arguments are sometimes self defeating "why couldn't they find much from the plane?" "what happened to all the fuel?"

Gee.. what happens when we mix an explosion - several thousand gallons of high octane anything and aluminum, one of the least stable metals?

I highly doubt you will find either fuel or aluminum left over from such a fire.

lol these aren't questions irf, they are stupid little conspiratorial blurbs to the music of marilyn manson to get you to buy her book.

You — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 20:39

wow dave!

How did you figure that out?

I myself found it hard to link the muppets until you presented that document!

Dave — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 - 20:47

[quote="Admin"]He is a british agent sent to sabotage muslims!

That explains it all.

Thank you again dave![/quote]

lol well now that we've solved that problem.