Black Flags of Khorasan/Afghanistan

muhammadalfatih

INTRODUCTION

1) Black Flags :
There are two types of flags in Islam.

The first is called Al-Liwaa and serves as the sign for the leader of the Muslim army. It is also the flag of the Islamic State. The Liwaa of the Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) was a piece of white cloth with the words لآ اِلهَ اِلَّا اللّهُ مُحَمَّدُ رَّسُوْلُ اللّهِ written across it .

The other is termed as Ar-Raya and is used by the Muslim army. The Raya of the Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) was a piece of black wool with the words لآ اِلهَ اِلَّا اللّهُ مُحَمَّدُ رَّسُوْلُ اللّهِ  written on it.

Therefore, the Liwaa is a white flag with black inscription and the Raya is a black flag with white inscription .

  
2) Khorasan :
Khorasan in the time of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) included the whole of Afghanistan, Northern parts of Pakistan including Malakand Division, Central Asian States, part of Iran. Still a province in the North East of the Iran is named as Khorasan. Details

Approximate Map
PURPOSE
The basic purpose of this page is to create awareness among our Muslim youth about the army that will rise from the area of Khurasan holding Black Flags of Islam . This army will conquer many occupied lands of Muslims till it reaches to Jerusalem . Then it will pledge its allegiance to Imam al Mahdi (A.S) .

HADITHS

Narrated Anas:
The Prophet had informed the people of the martyrdom of Zaid, Ja'far and Ibn Rawaha before the news of their death reached. The Prophet said, "Zaid took the flag (as the commander of the army) and was martyred, then Ja'far took it and was martyred, and then Ibn Rawaha took it (Ar Raya) and was martyred." At that time the Prophet's eyes were shedding tears. He added, "Then the flag was taken by a Sword amongst the Swords of Allah (i.e. Khalid) and Allah made them (i.e. the Muslims) victorious."
Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) - (Al-Maghaazi) - Bukhari : Book 5 : Volume 59 : Hadith 561

Al-Barra’a Ibnu Azeb (ra) was asked about the Messenger’s (Peace Be Upon Him) Raya. He said: “It was black, had four corners and was made of wool.”

These and other ahadith clearly prove that Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) had designated a flag for his Ummah. 

The Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) of Allah  conquered and entered Makkah with a Liwaa (white flag)

Black Flags / Black banners From East i.e Khurasan (Afghanistan)
Abu Abdullah Nuaim Ibn Hammad on a chain of transmission on the authority of Al Zuhari who said " The black flags will come from the East, led by mighty men, with long hair and beards, their surnames are taken from the names of their home towns (i.e. Khosti or from Khost etc.) and their first names are from a "Kunya"
(Asmal Masalik Lieyyam Mahdiyy Maliki Li Kull-id Dunya Biemrillah-il Malik, Qalda bin Zayd)
Hadhrat Buraidah (R.A.) says that Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: "There will be many armies after me. You must join that army which will come from Khurasaan."
(Ibn Adi)

On the authority of Thawbaan (May Allah be pleased with him), the Messenger of Allah said:
"If you see the Black Banners coming from Khurasan go to them immediately, even if you must crawl over ice, because indeed amongst them is the Caliph, Al Mahdi."
[Narrated on authority of Ibn Majah, Al-Hakim, Ahmad]

Narrated by Abdur Rehman Al-Jarshi that I heard companion of Dear Prophet(salallaho alayhay wa sallam), Hazrat Amr Bin Marra Al-jamli(R.A) that Dear Prophet(salallaho alayhay wa sallam) said: Surely Black Flag will appear from the Khorasan until the people(under the leadership of this flag) will tie their horses with the Olive Trees between Bait-e-Lahya and Harasta. We asked are there any Olive trees between these places. He said,”If there isn’t then soon it will grow so that those people(of Khorasan) will come and tie their horses there.”
[Ref: Kitab-al-Fitan Page 215. Also at Page 108 in the book “Islam main Imam Mahdi ka Tasawer” by Maulana Professor Muhammad Yousaf Khan,Jamia Ashrafia Lahore,Pakistan.]

Harasta (Arabic: حرستا , transliteration: Ḥarastā) , also known as Harasta al-Basal, is a Syrian city administratively belonging to Rif Dimashq. Harasta has an altitude of 702 meters. It has a population of 38,184 as of 2007, making it the 43rd largest city per geographical entity in Syria.

Beit Lahia (Arabic: بيت لاهيا or بيت لاهية) is a town under Palestinian Authority of about 40,000 people in the northern Gaza Strip. It is located north of Jabalia, near Beit Hanoun and the border with Israel. Hamas, an Islamic party, took control of it during the 2005 municipal elections.

The word “Lahia” is Syriac and means “desolate” or “tiresome”. It is surrounded by sand dunes, some rise to 55m above sea level. The area is renowned for its many large Sycamore trees. The Israeli settlements of Nisanit, Elei Sinai, and Dugit that were in close proximity to Beit Lahia were evacuated during August 2005.Beit Lahia بيت لاهي Beit Lahiya Bayt Lahiya

Google Maps
Thawban said, "The Prophet said: 'Three men will be killed at the place where your treasure is.  Each of them will be the son of a Khalifah, and none of  them will get hold of the treasure.  Then black banners will come out of the east...' If you see him, go and give him your allegiance, even if you have to  crawl over ice, because he is the Khalifah of Allah, the Mahdi.'"
Ref : This hadith is reported in Sunan Ibn Majah vol 3 number 4084  in  'Kitab al-Fitan, Baab Kharuj al-Mahdi' and 'Mustadrak' al-Hakim. Hakim classified it as saheeh on the conditions set by al-Bukhari and Muslim and al-Dhahabi agreed. Ibn Kathir wrote about it in his 'al-Nihaya (al-Fitan wa al-Malahim)' that its isnaad is 'qawii' (strong). al-Albani considers some of the chains as unacceptable, but writes the hadith is correct in meaning without the addition, 'he is the Khalifah of Allah, the Mahdi.' He rates the isnaad of Ibn Majah from 'Alqama from Ibn Mas'ud as hasan which does not have the words, 'khalifa-tullah.' He then goes on to discuss why this addition is not acceptable. ('Silsilah al-Ahadeeth al-Da'eefah wa al-Maudu'a', vol 1, p. 195-198, Hadith #85)

You’ll join hands with a Christian group and war with another. You’ll gain victoryAt that time, you will be present in a plain of great mountains with plenty of trees. In the meantime, the Christians will raise the crucifix and refer the victory to it. At this, a Muslim will become angry, and will pull the crucifix down, at which, the Christians will unite breaking all treaties with the Muslims.The Christians will demand their wanted people, to which the Muslims will answer:"By Allah! They are our brothers. We will never hand them over. This will start the war. One-third Muslims will run away. Their ‘Tawbah’ (Repentance) will never be accepted.. One-third will be killed.They will be the best 'Shaheed' (martyrs) near Allah The remaining one-third will gain victory
(6708,6709  Ibn Hibban)

At the time, when the Muslim Ummah will have abundance of wealth, gold and silver, the Muslims will be extremely belittled, weak and helpless. The enemy nations will invite each other to pounce upon them as hungry people invite one another for food. The Sahabah (R.A) asked with utter worry, "O Prophet of Allah! Would we be very few in number?" Prophet Muhammad (S) replied: "No! You’d be as great in quantity as the foam of the sea is, seen wherever the eye can reach. But you’ll be overtaken by ‘wahn’." The Sahabah (R.A) asked, "O Prophet of Allah! What is ‘wahn’?" He (S) replied: "Love of this world and fear of death!" You’ll join hands with a Christian group and war with another. You’ll gain victory.  At that time, you will be present in a plain of great mountains with plenty of trees. In the meantime, the Christians will raise the crucifix and refer the victory to it. At this, a Muslim will become angry, and will pull the crucifix down, at which, the Christians will unite breaking all treaties with the Muslims.The Christians will demand their wanted people, to which the Muslims will answer:"By Allah! They are our brothers. We will never hand them over." This will start the war. One-third Muslims will run away. Their ‘Tawbah’ (Repentance) will never be accepted. One-third will be killed. They will be the best 'Shaheed' (martyrs) near Allah. The remaining one-third will gain victory, until, under the leadership of Imam Mehdi, they will fight against Kufr  (non-believers)..
(Ibn Majah)

Reported on a chain of transmission on the authority of Kaab "The sign of the Mahdi's appearance will be war banners coming from the west, lead by a man with a disability from "Kinda"
(Nuaym son of Hammad, Al-Fitan page 205)

*Note: Genreral Richard Meyers, commander of the US Joint chiefs of staff decalared the war on Afghanistan in October 2001 on crutches.

There is a Hadith of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ about the symbols of the Judgment day that people with the Black Flag will rise up from the land of Khurasaan to fight against Kuffar Alliances in the Final War of Armageddon.
  

Geographically, Syria is a land of great diversity that includes coastline, mountainous areas, steppe, and desert.

Geographically, Syria can be divided into four regions. A narrow fertile coastal plain runs along the Mediterranean border and extends inland to a narrow range of mountains and hills. The coastal climate is moderate with hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters; the average annual rainfall is this area is between 30 and 40 inches. The mountainous region runs from north to south, parallel to the Mediterranean Sea. The interior semiarid plains region is found to the east of the mountains. Much of the southeastern part of Syria is desert region that extends to the borders of Jordan and Iraq; most of the desert is a rock and gravel plateau that receives less than four inches of rain annually and is extremely hot.

You will make a firm truce with the Christians (al-Rum) until you and they wage a campaign against an enemy that is attacking them. You will be granted victory and great spoils. Then you will alight in a plain surrounded by hills. There, someone among the Christians shall say: 'The Cross has overcome!' whereupon someone among the Muslims shall say: 'Nay, Allah has overcome!' and shall go and break the cross.
The Christians shall kill him, then the Muslims shall take up their arms and the two sides shall fall upon each other.
Allah shall grant martyrdom to that group of Muslims. After that the Christians shall say to their leader: 'We shall relieve you of the Arabs,' and they shall gather up for the great battle (al-malhama). They shall come to you under eighty flags, each flag gathering 12,000 troops." [approx. 1 million]
Narrated with sound chains from Dhu Mikhbar al-Najashi by Abu Dawud, Ahmad, Ibn Majah, Ibn Hibban, and al-Hakim who declared it sahih and al-Dhahabi concurred. See Shaykh Shu`ayb Arna'ut's documentation of this hadith in his edition of Sahih Ibn Hibban (15:101-103 #6708-6709).

Narrated Abu Hurayrah: Allah's Apostle (peace_be_upon_him) said: The Last Hour will not come until the Romans land at al-A'maq or in Dabiq [north of Aleppo( a city in northen syria).]A n army consisting of the best (soldiers) of the people on Earth at that time will come from Medina (to oppose them). When they arrange themselves in ranks, the Romans will say: Do not stand between us and those (Muslims) who took prisoners from among us. Let us fight them. The Muslims will say: Nay, by Allah, we shall never turn aside from you and from our brethren so that you may fight them.
They will then fight and a third (part) of the army, whom Allah will never forgive, will run away. A third (part of the army), which will be constituted of excellent martyrs in Allah's eyes, would be killed. The third who will never be put on trial will win and they will be the conquerors of Constantinople. (and/or Rome)
As they are busy in distributing the spoils of war (amongst themselves) after hanging their swords by the olive trees, Satan will cry: The Dajjal has taken your place among your families. They will then come out, but it will be of no avail. When they reach Syria, he will come out while they are still preparing themselves for battle, drawing up the ranks. Certainly, the time of prayer will come and then ‘Eessa (peace_be_upon_him), son of Maryam, descends and will lead them in prayer. When the enemy of Allah sees him, it will (disappear) just as salt dissolves in water and if he (‘Eessa) were not to confront them at all, even then it would dissolve completely. Allah would kill them by his hand and he would show them their blood on his lance.
(Muslim Book No: 40 No: 6924)

*Note: This is the part of the victorious army from Afghanistan-Taliban war facing similar fate in three categories,here connecting the old victorios army's fate with the current victorious army.Hence the victoriours army never lost continuty in its entirety.

Forum

You — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 - 15:03

[quote=muhammadalfatih]

for khalid ra i need you to show me the narration he says that as as usual sufis are never to be trusted in these matters especially in narrations [/quote]

It is posts like this that make me say "find it yourself".

If you do not think it is worthy of investigation, then so be it.

muhammadalfatih — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 - 19:06

[quote=You][quote=muhammadalfatih]

for khalid ra i need you to show me the narration he says that as as usual sufis are never to be trusted in these matters especially in narrations [/quote]

It is posts like this that make me say "find it yourself".

If you do not think it is worthy of investigation, then so be it.[/quote]

you sufis are too paranoid 

Hazrat Abu Hurairah (R.A.). He says that my intimate friend Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H.) told me that:

“ In this Ummah, the troops would be headed towards Sindh & Hind”

Hazrat Abu Hurairah (R.A.) says that if I could find a chance to participate in any of such movement & (while participating in it) I be got martyred, then well & good; if came back as a survived warrior, then I would be a free Abu Hurairah, to whom Allah Almighty would have given freedom from the Hell.”

References:

Imam bin Hambal (R) narrated this Hadees in ‘Masnad’.
And Ibn-e-Kaseer copied with his reference in ‘Al-Badaya Wa Nahaya’

from the hadith we can see sahabah ra used to refer muhammad saw as their friend why would it be shirk to call muhammad saw their companion

 

muhammadalfatih — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 - 19:22

[quote=As i see it]@ muhammadalfatih[

first of all jesus didnt speak a work of hebrew he only spoke aramaic your own priests and popes confirmed this ]

@ As i see it

How did Jesus read from the Torah in the Synagogue if he could not read Hebrew?

can you show evidence from the bible where it states jesus used to read bible in hebrew in church

@ muhammadalfatih

[ as for shia sunni shia came into existence way later and only 10 percent are shia which clearly shows they came later on into existence are declared false, ali ra the very man they worship declared them kafir and he even executed many of them so your argument is as flawed as your bible ]

@ As i see it

The above only proves that even then as now fellow Muslims cannot discuss freely their religion without resorting to violence.

you kafir failed to do anythin with hitler without the world war the bigest war seen by even the satans

@ muhammadalfatih

[ as for islam21c i dont know if your acting dumb: ]

@ As i see it

Apart from http://www.islam21c.com/politics/conclusive-scholarly-opinions-on-isis/ which is dated 10/07/2014. The rest appear to be anti-west or blaming the west for ISIS. Or indeed saying that it is all the wests fault for what is happening.

if you check the link i gave it shows that all/nearly all top muslim scholars were speaking against isis seeing your too thick too understand i'll break it down further it is like you would claim your pope is advising people to stop evil 

Indeed it would be interesting to know what your answers would be for solving the violence bettween people in Syria/Iraq or indeed the violence that is happening in Nigeria. Or for that matter how the people of planet earth can get along, be they Muslim, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddist or indeed of no interest in religion whatsoever, but just want to live their lives in their own way?

it will end the similar way your country dealt with hitler 

people in past got along perfect despite religion when you christians were killing jews we muslims allowed them to stay in palestine when ottoman were ruling it, in  andalus were jews lived happily, and in afghanistan under taliban sikh were living in peace something your biased media didnt mention the only people who failed to get along with others were christians, under british empire you robbed africa then asia then america until your downfall started, you destroyed your own religion the true christians orthodox and replaced it with your fake catholic religion:

‘I would rather see the Muslim turban in the midst of the city than the Latin mitre’.

Grand Duke Lukas Notaras after the Council of Florence in 1452

St Alexander Nevsky preferred ‘political submission to the infidel rather than what he felt would be spiritual capitulation to the Church of Rome’....’The Mohammedans in the fifteenth century were far more tolerant towards Christianity than western Christians were towards one another during the Reformation and in the seventeenth’….’It is small wonder that Orthodox, when they saw what was happening in Poland (in the seventeenth century) should prefer Mohammedan to Roman Catholic rulers’.

Bishop Kallistos Ware, The Orthodox Church, pp. 92, 96 and 105 (first edition)

[/quote]

You — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 - 19:40

Arabic for friend/wali does not imply similarity or equality so its different.

For instance when we use the word saint, the arabic for it is not "saint" but "Friend of Allah (swt)".

by the way brother you was joking even today your too easy to lose it 

My character has worsened over time.

muhammadalfatih — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 - 22:19

[quote=You]Arabic for friend/wali does not imply similarity or equality so its different.

For instance when we use the word saint, the arabic for it is not "saint" but "Friend of Allah (swt)".

by the way brother you was joking even today your too easy to lose it 

My character has worsened over time.[/quote]

actually the wod used was mawla, which has many definition but in field of definition it is like companion friend

again sahaba ra who were friends with muhammad saw before prophethood remained his friend after difference was they now viewed him as their prophet, leader but they didnt forget the friendship 

As i see it — Sun, 18 Jan 2015 - 19:48

@ muhammadalfatih

[ if you check the link i gave it shows that all/nearly all top muslim scholars were speaking against isis seeing your too thick too understand i'll break it down further it is like you would claim your pope is advising people to stop evil ]

@ As i see it

Do you mean these links?

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/conclusive-scholarly-opinions-on-isis/  Date 10/07/2014

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/the-caliphate-of-al-baghdadi-announcement-from-syrian-scholars/  date 09/07/2014

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/5616-do-we-go-for-jihad-in-syria/ Date 17/12/2012

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/awkward-questions-surrounding-the-war-on-isis/ Date 07/11/2014

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/warning-to-sisters-going-for-jihad-in-syria/  Date 08/07/2014

@ as i see it

Indeed it would be interesting to know what your answers would be for solving the violence bettween people in Syria/Iraq or indeed the violence that is happening in Nigeria. Or for that matter how the people of planet earth can get along, be they Muslim, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddist or indeed of no interest in religion whatsoever, but just want to live their lives in their own way?

@ muhammadalfatih

it will end the similar way your country dealt with hitler 

people in past got along perfect despite religion when you christians were killing jews we muslims allowed them to stay in palestine when ottoman were ruling it, in  andalus were jews lived happily, and in afghanistan under taliban sikh were living in peace something your biased media didnt mention the only people who failed to get along with others were christians, under british empire you robbed africa then asia then america until your downfall started, you destroyed your own religion the true christians orthodox and replaced it with your fake catholic religion:

@ As i see it

Are you saying that the west will go to war against Islam? I truly hope you do not mean that.

Also i suppose if the people in the west just acept dimmi status in their own countries then all will be well. Is that what you mean?

@ muhammadalfatih

Grand Duke Lukas Notaras after the Council of Florence in 1452

@ As i see it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loukas_Notaras  This article gives a different version. of the event.

 

 

muhammadalfatih — Sat, 24 Jan 2015 - 13:58

[quote=As i see it]@ muhammadalfatih

[ if you check the link i gave it shows that all/nearly all top muslim scholars were speaking against isis seeing your too thick too understand i'll break it down further it is like you would claim your pope is advising people to stop evil ]

@ As i see it

Do you mean these links?

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/conclusive-scholarly-opinions-on-isis/  Date 10/07/2014

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/the-caliphate-of-al-baghdadi-announcement-from-syrian-scholars/  date 09/07/2014

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/5616-do-we-go-for-jihad-in-syria/ Date 17/12/2012

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/awkward-questions-surrounding-the-war-on-isis/ Date 07/11/2014

http://www.islam21c.com/politics/warning-to-sisters-going-for-jihad-in-syria/  Date 08/07/2014

@ as i see it

Indeed it would be interesting to know what your answers would be for solving the violence bettween people in Syria/Iraq or indeed the violence that is happening in Nigeria. Or for that matter how the people of planet earth can get along, be they Muslim, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddist or indeed of no interest in religion whatsoever, but just want to live their lives in their own way?

@ muhammadalfatih

it will end the similar way your country dealt with hitler 

people in past got along perfect despite religion when you christians were killing jews we muslims allowed them to stay in palestine when ottoman were ruling it, in  andalus were jews lived happily, and in afghanistan under taliban sikh were living in peace something your biased media didnt mention the only people who failed to get along with others were christians, under british empire you robbed africa then asia then america until your downfall started, you destroyed your own religion the true christians orthodox and replaced it with your fake catholic religion:

@ As i see it

Are you saying that the west will go to war against Islam? I truly hope you do not mean that.

Also i suppose if the people in the west just acept dimmi status in their own countries then all will be well. Is that what you mean?

@ muhammadalfatih

Grand Duke Lukas Notaras after the Council of Florence in 1452

@ As i see it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loukas_Notaras  This article gives a different version. of the event.

 

 [/quote]

Robert Craighall (not verified) — Mon, 27 Nov 2017 - 08:13

The deviant Sufi “Mathab” is a distraction for the Ummah. The practice of permissible renunciation and deep spirituality is entirely contained in the practice (ie Sunanh) of Islam’s Holy Prophet (SAW). There is no need for a hyper “spiritualised” version of Islam.The prophet taught the middle path. This deviant mindset is rooted in cowardice.The Barelwi movement of Ahmed Raza Khan is the sub-continental arm of this sect. They actively supported the British in India and Raza Khan presented a Fatwa against the idea of Jihad against the British in India on the grounds that the British were “Ahlul Kitab”. How utterly morally repulsive and intellectually stunted.

The ulema who time and time again rose to the defence of Muslim lands were very seldom not adherents of sheikhul Islam ibn Taymiyyah. So most naturally the attack against the adherents of ibn Taymiyyah as represented nowadays by the teachings of ibn al Wahhab (as a reformer against the deviant Sufi mindset which had taken root in Arabia in his time).

Unfortunately, Muslims have been duped by a very slick Western propaganda campaign gathering steam since America’s big False Flag, 911, that 1stly tries to equate Wahabbism to an “ism” – a sect, which it clearly is not, and secondly, as synonomous and inseparable from Saudi actions and the Saudi family – nothing could be further from the truth.

The campaign has reached it’s zenith in the villification of Jihad by America’s creation of ISIS (a non ideological US-Israeli led mercenary army of atrocity commiting thugs) and an equally ridiculous “Caliphate” – They created an army that would be deviantly extreme in their application of Islam, Shariah and violence, that Muslims and people the world over would be repulsed by the very notion of defensive jihad and militant, political Islam and hand over our lands willingly to Western interests, culture and lifestyle and would allow the US and the West an excuse to gain unfettered military access and commit subversion in our lands on the flimsiest of excuses.(In the final hours of the defeat of Daesh at Al bu Kamal in Syria, the US stepped in to save their ISIS assets and airlifted senior ISIS operatives from the town. ISIS commanders are usually US or Israeli/British special forces – thats why the constant use of Balaclava to conceal faces).Deviants like Hamza Yousef are a part of US designs, knowingly or unknowingly. ISIS is a cleverly crafted weapon against Islam using Muslim aspirational desires for dignity and freedom from Western servility rooted in the idea of a genuine Caliphate and perverted that notion using eschatalogical references like the Black Flag hadith to craft an image for ISIS. In the age of media and internet, the entire world has succumbed to this US-Israeli Black-Ops called ISIS.

ibn Wahhab saw the destructive passivism (cowardice) of the Sufi deviants as a force for regression in Muslim lands and moved to contain it. 

These idiots believe that by arse-kissing the opressor, Islam and Muslims will be left alone, they choose obsequoius submission above honourable resistance.

The love they profess for the prophet is merely on their lips, whilst denouncing those who shed blood and made the ultimate sacrifice and expression of love and obedience in the defence of islam.

You — Fri, 1 Dec 2017 - 21:59

Ibn wahhab was not from a land that was controlled by non uslim imperial forces.

He was on land controlled by the Caliphate. He and his followers rebelled against it.

abdulqadirjilani (not verified) — Wed, 12 Dec 2018 - 19:28

This is old but muhammad ibn Abdul wahab was not  from a caliphate controlled land ottoman never took control of the najd region and other one of the reason was it had no benefit to them so they only took control or parts of arab world